For clubs with assets, insurers usually require waivers -- their waivers. It does not really matter if the waivers hold water or not -- if you want coverage you must use them. For clubs without assets, the richest pockets will be the club directors or trip leaders. Whether there is a waiver or not, the injured party will be coming after them. If they had been insured through the club, then the insurance company would also be on the line and would mount a defence. Who would be better positioned to put up a defence, Joe Instructor or State Farm? Regardless of how good the waiver is, you can limit your exposure through insurance. When it comes down to waivers, they let the defendant use the defence of voluntary assumption of risk. They only come into the matter once it looks like the defendant was negligent. Obviously the best way to stop an action is to avoid being negligent, rather than to be negligent and pray that a waiver will protect you. Consequently, insurers are now requiring clubs to implement risk management plans, and independant of the insurance issue, many clubs are requiring formal, ongoing training and certification for trip leaders, the filing of trip plans, and the preparing of emergency plans. If the worst has happened and you find youself needing to be saved by a waiver, you have to worry about a number of things. First, the risk which you claim has been voluntarily assumed by the plaintiff must have been expressly stated in the waiver. You have to be pretty specific about what risk is involved, but if you get too broad then you run the risk of the court saying that the contract was too one-sided, and should be construed strictly against you because what you were demanding was unreasonable or oppressive. This gets very difficult for businesses, where the courts are concerned about the bargaining advantage a business might have over a client. You also have to pay attention to when the waiver was signed. If you have your client sign it too early, before she could know the risks, then it is void. If it is signed after the formation of the contract, then it is too late. Either way you are cooked. To make it more difficult, you also have to watch out for prior inconsistent oral representation -- for example if you say to Jackie that your kayaking lessons are safe, so she decides to take one with you, your waiver against her might not hold up due to your earlier assertion. In short, waivers give you a shot at a defence, but the courts will try to find a way of tossing them. Use a waiver, but don't depend on a waiver. The next area of voluntary assumption of risk concerns implied assumption of risk. Waiver or not, when Jackie takes a header, you will argue that she knew that kayaking was dangerous and that she impliedly assumed the risk. This works quite well for minor stuff which you can expect to encounter by mererly participating -- the expected swims, bumps and grinds. It does not work for extradordinary stuff, for example, a leader taking Jackie down something hellacious on her first lesson, or a leader failing to warn Jackie of an obstacle that could cause her grief. As you have probably already noticed, a lot depends on Jackie's competence, on the leader's competence, and on the implied relationship between them. If Jackie is a new paddler and you run her through class IV, you probably are negligent. If Jackie is a class V padder and you run her through class II, you probably are not negligent. It really depend on the circumstances. Looking at the circumstances, what hazards are coincident with mere participation, and what hazards involve negligence? There is no clear answer. In conclusion, don't count on anything getting you off if you have been negligent. Arguing voluntary assumption of risk via express waiver terms or via implied assumptions is a last resort which may get you off, but should not be depended upon. The more negligent your behaviour, the less chance you have. Richard Culpeper www.geocities.com/~culpeper culpeper_at_geocities.com *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Feb 09 1998 - 16:40:45 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:52 PDT