I think that one of the most important assessments to make when considering a rescue is: what is the risk of the rescuers themselves becoming victims? I think that if a group makes the explicit decision not to attempt or seek rescue then it is probably a sober and intelligent reflection of the seriousness of the conditions and their appreciation of them. If a group appreciates the conditions and makes such a decision then it is their ethical decision at that time, and I fail to see how it is relevant outside of those conditions, or in anyway relevant to mixed ability group dynamics. There is a very interesting discussion related to this topic at: http://www.tassie.net.au/~lford/philos.htm Each unto his own. Cheers Colin ______________________________________________________ Dr Colin Calder Centre for CBL in Land Use and Environmental Sciences (CLUES) MacRobert Building, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, AB24 5UA, UK, Scotland ______________________________________________________ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Feb 26 1998 - 08:16:53 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:53 PDT