At 07:23 AM 2/2/98 -0500, John wrote: > No doubt sponsons could be improved. Nothing is perfect. One could also >take another approach. Why not make sponsons redundant? Why not design >boats with enough stability to allow wet re-entry without having to use >sponsons? John: Wouldn't providing enough initial stability to enable reentering require increasing the beam so much as to reduce final stability to the point that capsize in the first place could conceivably be more likely? > Brian > >Cheers >John Winters >Redwing Designs >Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft >http://home.ican.net/~735769/ > > > > >*************************************************************************** >PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List >Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net >Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net >*************************************************************************** > *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net ***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:46 PDT