In following the posts on this topic it came to me in one of those blinding flashes of over simplification that the way to avoid problems in a club is to properly define the purpose of the club. For instance, suppose the Sink or Swim Kayak Club was formed to provide social events for kayakers, serve as an introduction service for paddling partners and a source of paddling information. It would do no formal instruction and set no paddling rules other than no adult member would be allowed to molest the young boys or girls at a club sponsored nude swimming party. Club trips would not exist. Rather, the newsletter would announce that; "Jackie Fenton will be paddling to Hawaii tomorrow afternoon and welcomes company". Or Richard Culpeper is going to practice his rolls next month at the week Waterloo Sewage Lagoon and welcomes fellow paddlers for a fun day. These are clearly individual activities. If the club has no safety rules and makes it clear that it is only there for social events and to advertise member activities it surely cannot be held responsible for anything outside its mandate. Club dynamics vary from club to club but it seems that the reason so many people don't join clubs is not because the membership is a clique or even bureaucratic and overly regulated but because there simply isn't any need (on an individual basis) to belong or participate in club activities. The boats are portable, the clubs usually have no facility for social gatherings, and the only thing that might tie them together - paddling - does not require a club membership to do. Contrast the sea kayaker with the sprint racer. Can't be done without the clubs organising things and training requires coaches, facilities etc.. That the clubs become a centre of social activity as well also nurtures growth. In Britain the clubs are rather strong because they have strong social ties as well a powerful influence on paddling through the BCU. Whether one likes the model or not is not a determination of its success. Personally I found Dennis Adams post a trifle patronising and offensive. To base any assumptions about what Canadians are like on the "few Canadians" he knows is just a bit much and to suggest that working co-operatively to reach a goal is in any way sheep like is fatuous. If one does not want to offend one needs to choose words more carefully. Everything that Dennis says about small headed club type can also be said about rugged individualists that don't belong to clubs. Some are so small headed that clubs won't even have them. Clubs have no monopoly on jerks. As for cliques, by definition those who paddle with the same people all the time form a clique and there is no law that cliques must belong to clubs. Perhaps Dennis has confused the visibility of clubs with omnipresence. It is odd that a clique within a club is considered in a negative light but a clique outside the club is just a bunch of friends having a good time together. Actually I don't see all that much difference between what the WCA does and the Rocky Mountain Canoe Club - except that there might be more of us. We also have members who are much like Dennis. Skilled. eager to share their knowledge, fun to be with, active in club activities, people who believe in instruction but also believe in learning by doing etc.. etc.. I, of course, am not one of them possibly because I hold dual citizenship and simply can't decide whether I am an individual asshole or a collective one. Cheers, John Winters Redwing Designs Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft http://home.ican.net/~735769/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Mar 05 1998 - 06:00:35 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:53 PDT