yup. At, my then, 145# my Arluk III only really settled to an appropriate waterline with 100# of gear/water. It was "impossible" to edge with that kind of ballast, really requiring a rudder/skeg for efficient efforts (if in an open top(e.g. Canadian canoe), I could stand to get the leverage, obviating the advantage of a rudder:). Without that excessive ballast, the boat was blown about, requiring the almost never used rudder/skeg for efficient efforts. A much lower volume boat has not exhibited these tendencies. My experiences lead me to conclude; appropriate boat size for corresponding paddler obviate the need for an open top boat, rudder, and skeg:). Leander wrote: > At 08:14 AM 27-03-98 -0800, Dan Hagen wrote: > ...snipped... > >First, you state (as though it were fact) that the Caribou is "very > >difficult in winds". The correct statement is that the Caribou is > >difficult *for some paddlers* to handle in the wind. While I have read > >reports that some folks have difficulty controlling the Caribou in > >winds, I can only conclude that this is because they have not developed > >the requisite skills. ...snipped... > > In the discussion of whether a kayak "needs" a rudder/skeg or not, certainly, > as many have pointed out, design of the kayak is of first importance. Second, > skill of the paddler is paramount, and a paddler who requires a rudder/skeg > one > year, may not need it as there skills improve. But there is a third issue > which > many seem to forget; we all know of kayaks which behave better in tough > conditions if they are loaded, but are quite difficult to control when > unloaded. Now let's consider something we often forget, which is the weight of > the paddler. > A paddler in a boat built for the "average kayaker", will likely be > paddling > a design who's intended operator is presumed to be around 160-200 pounds. This > kayak will handle optimally with a paddler of this size carrying the usual > paraphernalia we so love to bring along. But what happens when the paddler is > only 120 pounds? The kayak rides higher than it's intended design, and may be > more difficult to handle in the same conditions the 180 pound paddler finds > comfortable. So while improving skills will help, if the boat is not at the > optimal water line, the paddler is penalized in its handling characteristics. > I think it's really important for a paddler to get a kayak properly sized > for their weight and intended use...by which I mean do you plan to mostly > day-trip, or go camping...so you can paddle at the design's most efficient > waterline. This goes for larger/heavier paddlers, too, as they can no doubt > attest. > I'd like to hear comments from others on this issue, both user's and > designers. > Leander > overfall_at_ix.netcom.com > > *************************************************************************** > PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List > Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net > Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net > Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ > *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Mar 27 1998 - 20:46:42 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:54 PDT