Re: [Paddlewise] Rudders/ frequency

From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 11:58:39 -0500
Bob wrote;

re: rudders

>
>johnw, you design both ... what are your thoughts [and i duck and run
>awaya again ;-)]


There are people who need rudders no matter what boat they paddle.They lack
the skills or physical ability to handle a boat without one.

There are boats that need rudders because their design is such that they
cannot be held on course or manoeuvred without one.

There are people who have sufficient skills to handle a boat without a
rudder.

There are boats that are designed in such a way that a paddler can easily
learn to handle the boat without a rudder.

I do not design boats with rudders because I expect the customer to learn
the appropriate skills. however, I can understand the reasoning behind
designing boats with rudders for those people who may not want to learn
those skills or have a physical barrier to doing the required strokes.

Whether a rudder is desirable depends upon the persons skills, the type of
paddling, and the boat.

It is unrealistic to use any one person or any one boat as an example to
support either a pro or con rudder argument. Conditions, paddlers, and
boats are unique and even the same boat when improperly loaded will change
its characteristics so much as to shift from the "don't need one" to the
"do need one"  category. (This has been, mentioned elsewhere but it bears
repeating)

There is no reason why boats can't be designed that do not need rudders. On
the other hand there are reasons why it just isn't worth the effort to
convince the buyer that he or she can handle the boat without one.

>From a purely philosophical approach no system should be more complicated
than it has to be.  In the case of a sea kayak the basic premise is
remarkably simple. The paddle/paddler  provides both power and control. The
need to portage and the nature of small creeks, lakes, and rivers forced
natives to develop a craft that did not need a rudder and so canoes are
often both adequately manoeuvrable and adequately directionally stable
while paddlers learn to control their boats because there is no option.
Modern sea kayaks, not faced with portaging and shallow water problems,
adopted the rudder as a substitute for skills and/or to compensate for
certain design characteristics. If there had been some physical reason why
a rudder would have been undesirable then sea kayaks would have been
designed to be paddled without and this issue would never have surfaced
just as it has not surfaced as a serious issue for white water kayaks.

It is worth noting that some Inuit adopted crude rudders on directionally
unstable boats once they saw European ships and boats with them. It is
difficult to tell if the boats got directionally unstable after the rudder
became available or if the rudder came along later and was used to cure a
long standing design flaw.

Not sure this helps anyone. if you are interested in how and why boats turn
you can read my page on the topic at
http://home.ican.net/~735769/control.htm
It is non-commercial so there is no sales pitch on the page.

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/










***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Sat Mar 28 1998 - 09:30:32 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:54 PDT