One of my paddles is short with small blades. When I first started using it a couple of years ago, I felt insecure when bracing and rolling, for I was used to much larger blades. Although I no longer feel uneasy over it, I still find that I have to pay attention to my rolling technique, whereas with a big blade I don't have to think. I have always been partial to short shafts (e.g. sprint kayak sized rather than sea kayak sized) and the ensuing vertical stroke/body rotation. My preference is to zip about, take a break, zip about, take a break, and so on, so the sprint stroke meets my needs. Also, since I don't do too much with my arms, fatigue throughout the day is not that big a problem. I find that long shafts are a bit limiting for my personal preferences, for I am unable to rev fast enough. Unfortunately, most short shaft blades on the market are just too big for me to comfortably flail away for an entire day if I am in a big boat. When I am on day or weekend trips in a sprint boat there is no problem, but in my large sea kayak loaded to the gills with gear, I find stroking hard all day long to be a bit much. Therefore, I had a short shaft paddle made up with small blades. Now I can maintain my stroke rate and get full rotation without feeling like I am hanging from a rafter by the end of a day. Although I cannot accelerate as well as with a large blade paddle, I can still accelerate far more quickly than I can with a long shaft. I am not suggesting that this is the way to go, but if you are into a full-body stroke, starting from your toes and working up, you might give this sort of paddle a try. Richard Culpeper www.geocities.com/~culpeper Chuck Holst wrote: > >> > I don't know that anyone has done much with small blades and a more > vertical stroke. Always it seems to be small blades on long shafts > (Greenland) or large blades on short shafts (racing and white water) > . This > is not really a fair comparison. From a purely mechanical standpoint, > the > stroke closer to the boat wastes less energy (less wasted on turning > moment). From a purely biomechanical standpoint the more vertical > stroke > promotes more body rotation and use of torso muscles while making > best use > of the arms for maximum push and pull. > > It would seem to me that one might get best results using a small > blade > that did not stress muscles an a short paddle with a more upright > stroke > for greatest efficiency. The Greenland style of stroke may be a > product of > its length and poor physics. It may work because of the blade size and > > nothing else. This fits with what Jerry is saying - adjust the stroke > to > suit the paddle. The big question is, does the stroke control paddle > choice > or does the paddle choice control stroke? > > Cheers, > John Winters > Redwing Designs > Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft > http://home.ican.net/~735769/ > >> > > ** > *********************************************************************** > * > > I don't think of the Greenland paddle as a long paddle. Mine, which > is made to my dimensions using traditional methods, is about 218 cm > long. The blades are narrow but long (9.5 cm by 89 cm). And if you > look at old films of Greenlanders, such as K > nud Rasmussen's "Palos Brudefaerd," you do see torso rotation. You > also see both a low forward stroke and a high forward stroke in that > film. The higher, more vertical, stroke was used when more power was > needed. > > Chuck Holst > *********** > *************************************************************** > PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List > Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net > Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net > Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ > > ************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Apr 03 1998 - 12:17:31 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:55 PDT