PaddleWise by thread

From: Geo. Bergeron <heritage_at_europa.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] day trip report
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 15:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
At 02:49 PM 4/8/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Craig,
>
 As there were only 5 or 6 seals in this group
>I don't think they were in any danger of trampling themselves.
>
>"Get in a whale or two" does indeed mean that marine life excites us.  It
is also
>consistent with respecting and protecting them.  You say that kayaks may be
more
>disturbing to wildlife than motorized craft.  I differ with you there.  It
almost sounds
>like you are against whale watching from a kayak.  Personally, I think
whale watching
>ought to be *restricted* to kayaks only.

        Federal regulations were enacted to prevent people who "don't think
they [e.g. protected species] were in any danger" from endangering those
protected species. Kayaks don't look threatening to humans, but do you
really think a whale or seal knows the difference between a kayak and a
torpedo? kayak and a whaling boat? 

        If you want to be "consistent with respecting and protecting them"
you need to realize that ANY human contact is a potential threat to
protected species. What part of the APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL PROTECTION
LAW TO YOUR ACTONS do you not get? 

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_seasurf.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] day trip report
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 17:00:05 -0700
Geo. Bergeron wrote:

(In response to Keith's post:)

> > As there were only 5 or 6 seals in this group
> >I don't think they were in any danger of trampling themselves. [snip]

Had lots of unavoidable interactions with seals up here, and I agree
with Keith.  I have surely NEVER intentionally paddled up on a haulout
(even one with only a few seals), but have often rounded a corner only
to come on a handful ashore, both in the Columbia River, and on the West
Coast of BC.  Stuff happens.

> >You say that kayaks may be more
> >disturbing to wildlife than motorized craft.  I differ with you there. [snip]

I disagree with Keith, and agree with Craig Olson -- who says yaks *may*
be more upsetting to marine mammals than motorized craft.  FWIW, there
is lots of documentation supporting the greater impact on BIRDS from a
human silhouette than from an automobile (even a slowly moving one).  I
suspect there is no "one" answer, and that the situation and animal has
more to do with it than anything else.

(Now this is George:)

>         If you want to be "consistent with respecting and protecting them"
> you need to realize that ANY human contact is a potential threat to
> protected species. What part of the APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL PROTECTION
> LAW TO YOUR ACTIONS do you not get?

Whooaaa!  Chill, George!  Seems clear Keith and company "stumbled" on
the seals, and did not "pursue" the whales -- the whales "stumbled" on
Keith and party.  Lotta gray areas here.  I bet the next time Keith
returns to that spot, he will be aware of the haulout area and pursue a
different route -- he seems like a reasonable guy.

FWIW, nobody up here gets ticketed for actions like Keith describes --
only folks who are obviously intent on marine mammal harassment.  Big
time tolerance policy, I think.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
high priest of the "be reasonable to marine mammals" religion
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael R Noyes <mnoyes_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] day trip report
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 08:56:00 -0400
Geo. Bergeron wrote:

>
>
>         If you want to be "consistent with respecting and protecting them"
> you need to realize that ANY human contact is a potential threat to
> protected species. What part of the APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL PROTECTION
> LAW TO YOUR ACTONS do you not get?
>

It sounded to me as if he understands the act fully.  He did not seek out the
seals, and did not stick around when he stumbled upon them.  Although he
deliberately went to an area where he believed whales would be, he did not try
to approach them when they appeared.
The only caution I have on this is that seals ARE more afraid of kayaks than
they are of motorboats.  This has been documented. (see
http://www.qed.com/ack/ack/1994/april_94.htm#seals1)   But again, he did not
stick around to "harass" them.  Just being out on the water makes some contact
unavoidable, which is why the act states that it is ok to allow the animal to
approach you.

Mike
--
The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:49 PDT