I wrote: >>The waterproof paper shouldn't be used unless it is spec'd for the >>particular copier. I wouldn't try to run it. Run it on regular >"laser" >>paper and laminate it. >At 04:30 PM 5/13/98 -0700, Brian Heath wrote: >I don't understand. Why not? This is common practice in the U.S. >Forest Service and and in Forestry Schools. Hundreds of copiers produce >thousands of such copies every day without any ill effect that I am >aware of. My point of view is based on 9 years of maintaining or paying for maintenance on a wide range of copy machines. I don't reccomend that anybody run anything through that the manual doesn't specify as runnable. Unless the company that produces the copier (not the paper) says it will run, you will likely get charged for the parts and service if it melts on the photoreceptor or fuser, or emits a toxic gas that ruins parts or makes folks sick. The last part is not a joke. I've been seriously nauseous from the fumes emitted by melted "gel" or acetate of some unknown brand that someone chose to run through a self-service copy machine. Notice I didn't say the paper was not runnable, I simply said I wouldn't run it. A laminated sheet of regular color copy paper would not be prone to having the toner scratch off, as would a coated paper (which is what the only waterproof paper I've seen was). I'd hate for a warning on a map to be missed 'cause it got scratched off by my sunglasses case in my bag... *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu May 14 1998 - 16:05:13 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:56 PDT