John Winters wrote: > Poly boats do have more resistance due to the surface finish (rough center > seams etc..) and propensity of scratches that are proud of the hull > surface and often have hairy projections. The increase in frictional > resistance coefficient is roughly 3%. Not a whole lot but there > nonetheless. > > I know of no reason why a poly boat can't have as good a shape as an FRP > boat. I don't know why they don't. > > The one thing that makes poly boats less responsive (probably is the thing > most people notice) is the weight and, in particular the heavier ends. > Makes the boat less "lively". The flexible and often distorted bottoms also > erode performance but I am not sure by how much. I am awaiting a program to > study that. Not sure when I will get it as it is much delayed. I don't have the experience to know what "lively" means. But I assume the 10 lb difference in weight between poly and glass is trivial with respect to resistance. And I assume, that since you did not mention energy lost in flexing the boat (something I've heard from sales folks) that you consider it unimportant. Thus, in terms of energy spent in a long day of paddling, it sounds like 3% or so is my only worry. And that is well within my range of acceptable. Thanks! Brian *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri May 22 1998 - 18:07:06 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:57 PDT