Re: [Paddlewise] Solo touring canoe vs. solo sea kayak

From: Dan Hagen <dan_at_hagen.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 20:57:38 -0700
Robert C. Perkins wrote:
> 
> ...SNIP... I ran across a very pretty Bell a couple of
> weeks back, but I've never seen any of the Wenonah, Dagger, or Mad River
> models in the stores here in North Carolina.  I can find solo WW canoes but
> not solo touring canoes.

Don't forget to add Swift canoes to your list.  The Osprey and Raven are
outstanding boats (although according to John Winters the designer is a
bit of a jerk :-) 

It can be difficult in some parts of the country to find solo canoes to
"demo", as the market is a bit thin in some areas.  There are some
excellent designs out there --if you can find them.  One thing to think
about is the intended use.  The category of "touring" boats covers quite
a wide range of designs, from boats with signficant rocker, full ends,
and substantial depth (14-15 inches in the center) to boats that have
very little (or no) rocker, fine ends, and shallow depth.  I use the
first type for wilderness trips on rivers with significant whitewater
(up to class III), and the latter for flatwater touring. There are many
more solo designs available today than was the case 10 or 15 years ago. 
This applies not just to whitewater playboats but to tripping and
touring boats as well.  

Dan Hagen
Bellingham, Washington
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Fri Jul 17 1998 - 22:21:31 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:58 PDT