At 06:55 AM 7/21/98 -0400, John Winters wrote: >Bruce wrote; > >(Large snips) > > > >>Thus contrary to John's opinion (and contrary to mine the last time he and >I >>discussed this sort of thing), the weight distribution of the paddle >(moment >>of inertia) is important in the amount of (physiological) work one does, >>supporting the paddle against its inclination to turn in a disc instead of >a >>cone. > > >See how useful it is to have Bruce around. > >Now this raises a question. Typically wood Greenland style paddles are >heavier in the ends (blades) than modern lightweight paddles. Nevertheless, >users claim they require less effort to achieve the same result as work >than the low aspect ratio modern paddles. > >What is the explanation for this? > >Cheers, >John Winters >Redwing Designs >Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft >http://home.ican.net/~735769/ > > >What is the explanation for this? "Karma" is the answer plus the fact that the paddle is held lower for the stroke. With a lower height you don't notice the weight as much. Dana *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Jul 21 1998 - 05:42:19 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:58 PDT