Re: [Paddlewise] Different paddles, different strokes Re: confused Aussie :-)

From: Saul Kinderis <saul_at_isomedia.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 06:31:50 -0700
As Dan Hagen noted, it must be fun to argue about the little stuff that
doesn't matter much - or something to that effect.

All of this assumes a match between the paddle and the particular boat. 

If the boat has very little resistance to movement the paddle probably
doesn't move much.

If the boat has a lot more resistance than the paddle can move effeciently
(i.e. paddling a supertanker, or a floating dock), then it will move
significantly. - This would also be similar to the results you would get by
paddling with a small round stick, no matter what your technique.

Gotta go paddle 

-Have fun - Saul






At 07:51 AM 7/24/98 -0400, John Winters wrote:
>Rich wrote;
>
>>I will be happy to take this bet, provided the phrase "forward stroke" is
>>changed to "correctly performed forward stroke", since of course it's
>>possible (however undesirable) to take a poor stroke and move the paddle.
>>
>>Please purchase a copy of "The Kayaker's Edge" video available any number
>>of places, including directly from Performance Video, 550 Riverbend Road,
>>Durango, Colorado 81301, 888-259-5805 24-hour order line, 970-259-1361
>>voice line, 970-259-4148 fax line.  There is a demonstration of
>>this -- using stationary buoys -- about halfway through the tape.
>>
>>You may deduct the cost of the video from my $100 reward.
>
>The video is proof of nothing. First the movement of the paddle in the
>water is not revealed since there is insufficient close up to show if there
>are eddies around the paddle. Also, if I recall the video correctly, (I
>think I saw it at a canoe show some time back) there is no way of knowing
>what the flow is from the shots. Hence the flow could be around the paddle
>and not revealed by the relative motion of the boat to background objects.
>
>Sorry Rich, you don't get off so lightly. To prove your point you must
>actually prove it. Mind, if you do prove it I will be first to nominate you
>for a Nobel Prize in Physics since you will have overturned one of the
>basic principles of physics that a fluid will not support sheer forces.
>
>It will be worth the $100.
>
>You can help us in proving it for you if you will tell us what constitutes
>a perfect stroke. Then, I can prove it for you in my tank. IT will be loads
>of fun.
>
>
>Cheers,
>John Winters
>Redwing Designs
>Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
>http://home.ican.net/~735769/
>
>
>
>
>***************************************************************************
>PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
>Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
>Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
>Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
>***************************************************************************
>
>
Saul Kinderis     saul_at_isomedia.com          tel:(425)402-3426

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Fri Jul 24 1998 - 07:24:09 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:58 PDT