I am passing on this message from Margi Bohm that may be of interest to readers of Paddlewise. Margi's text begins here; One of our club members forwarded your discussion of the efficiency of prop (or wing) blade Vs the conventional flat blade. I found your discussion interesting for two reasons (1) I am the flatwater coach at the Burley Griffin Canoe Club here in Canberra, (2) I am a research scientist in the field of fluid mechanics so should be able to understand the Jackson et al paper. Do you have a year on that publication? I am very interested in giving it a read. I found your comments interesting and although I have not access to the entire gist of the emails regarding prop Vs conventional blades, I have taken the liberty below to suggest that there is more to maximising paddling efficiency than choosing a paddle. I feel that in the sea kayaking community, much would be gained by a serious effort to teach paddlers to paddle properly. Having good technique inevitably reduces injury and pains during a trip thereby enhancing enjoyment, especially in a recreational environment. I believe that technique coaching is really lacking in the sea kayak community. We muck around with boat (K1) and paddle performance (prop blade) under marathon and sprint conditions, also in the absence of a research grant. However, we search for a combination of boat design, paddle design, and paddling technique that gives the paddler MAXIMUM average BOAT SPEED over the distance of interest using REASONABLE EFFORT. This is the key, I believe, not only to enjoyment of ones sport, but also to success in a competitive environment. Our preliminary conclusions are that mathematically the efficiency of the system as a whole is an optimisation problem that includes stroke and boat performance and it is naive, in a flatwater racing environment, to assume that changing one component of the system will alone bring about dramatically improved performance. For example, initial introduction of prop blades into flatwater sprint paddling led to about 7% improvement on K1 boat-speed over 500 m. Improvements in boat design and paddling technique lead to an overall improvement of almost 15% (over a decade). We are again going through improvements in paddling technique aimed at optimising boat speed. I do believe that we have yet to maximise prob blade efficiency and there is still a lot of work to be done with technique. We have found using on water testing with heart rate monitors and SpeedCoaches (that give boat velocity and stroke rate) that maximum boat speed is often determined by a stroke rate that seems awfully slow. And different prop blade designs warrant different in water techniques to maximise boat speed. To further complicate matters, fine-tuning the system is athlete specific. For example, I have found that a stroke rate of 75 strokes/minute in a marathon environment gives me maximum boat speed at my current strength, 80 strokes per minute over a 500 m sprint. As I get stronger, I should be able to rate higher or with more power but the bottom line is that maximum boat speed depends on allowing the boat her maximum run before re-entering the blade into the water. As early as a few years ago, the consensus was 100-120 strokes per minute on the 500 m! If one monitors boat speed at a stroke rate of 120/min, and then drop the rating to 80 strokes per minute, the instruments register an almost immediate improvement in boat speed to the tune of at least 10 secs on the 500m depending on athlete and conditions. I have noticed the same phenomenon in marathon racing. As I get tired, my rating picks up to around 85 strokes per min and speed drops by 10-20 s/km. If I drop the rating back to 75 strokes/min, the speed picks back up again. How does this pertain to the sea kayaker? I have been to a few sea kayak gatherings and have several friends who sea kayak and paddle flatwater racing kayaks and I have paddled sea kayaks on a few occasions although always with a prop blade. My first observation is that most sea kayakers do not paddle conventional flat blades correctly and an improvement in boat speed (or in enjoyment of a trip because of improved efficiency) can be achieved by simply learning to paddle the flat blade efficiently. I feel that moving to a prop blade carrying poor flat blade technique would probably not improve performance and would probably result in the paddler being much more tired given the same paddling distance - bottom line ... decline in enjoyment of a trip. Furthermore, prop blades really catch well so given the weight of a sea kayak, the paddler has to be stronger to execute a stroke. Finally, poor technique, especially on the exit, can lead to nasty injuries that in older people will continue to haunt them for a long time unless due care is taken in treatment and recovery (an example is scapula impingement of the shoulder - a common overuse injury in kayaking and almost always related to poor technique). I think that stronger sea kayakers who want to cover larger distances should seriously think about using a prop blade BUT should ensure that they learn the prop blade paddling technique first and become competent prop blade paddlers. I would suggest learning from an experienced flatwater coach as these guys deal with prop blades all the time under all sorts of conditions (yes flatwater paddlers do paddle in rough water and weather conditions). I do not think that a prop blade is a disadvantage in rough water. Whitewater paddlers use them in water much rougher than that expected in a well planned sea kayak trip and rolling with a prop blade is a bit different but certainly not difficult! Same for surfing sea kayaks with a prop blade - different but not difficult. I find that the added catch of the blade allows me extra instant speed so catching a wave is actually easier than when using a flat blade. For the person who paddles once a blue moon or hasn't the interest in spending time to learn to paddle a prop blade, I would suggest sticking to the conventional flat blade. It is hard to hurt yourself with a flat blade although learning to paddle and use it properly would only make the trip more enjoyable. This has turned out longer than I expected. I hope you find my comments useful and feel free to post them on this net if you think they are useful to others. Happy Paddling Margi Bohm *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed Jul 29 1998 - 05:56:11 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:58 PDT