Re: [Paddlewise] Censorship

Apologies for responding directly to my *own* message... 8-}

> From: Jackie Fenton <jackie_at_intelenet.net>

> > 
> > Don't I recall you saying that you moved to Paddlewise to get away from
> > the sponson debate?  It was stopped on Paddlewise only through *censorship*
> > of the sponson discussion.
> 
> 
> Actually, the sponson discussion was censored on WaveLength, not PaddleWise.
> This was *the* reason PaddleWise was established, so that we could discuss 
> *all* paddling related topics, some controversial, without rancor or flaming.  
> And it was on PaddleWise that we were able to discuss sponsons quite
> openly and successfully for the *first* time.  For those interested in this 
> discussion, see:
> 
> http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/articles/sponson.html


I understand what you mean, now (sorry, Bob).  Yes, Tim Ingram *was*
censored on PaddleWise so that we could openly discuss sponsons in a 
sane and productive manner on PaddleWise (whereas the topic of sponsons 
had been issued a "no-discussion" moratorium on WaveLength).  

Cheers,

Jackie
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************