Re: [Paddlewise] learning curve and forgiveness

From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 08:36:00 -0400
Jerry wrote;
(SNIP of Ralph's comments)
>If it is true that long saddle time is required to get comfortable in the
>Nordkapp, does that imply, to use J Winters' term, that the Nordkapp
>requires active rather than passive control?  But isn't the Nordkapp
famous
>for long distance travel in rough conditions, rather than for playing
along
>the coast?

Yes, but in the cases I know of the people involved were rather remarkable
and the voyages were along the coast (Paul Caffyn for example).  I think
open water voyages have differnet requirements.

>
>Does it take a year to get used to the Nordkapp because it does not handle
>well?  Certainly, after a year in the Nordkapp, one would become a much
>better paddler.  But wouldn't a even Nordkapp trained paddler then be
better
>off, on a long open water crossing, in a more forgiving boat.  To
paraphrase
>J Winters, even a Nordkapp trained paddler could get tired or stupid.

I am not sure about the time involved but I suspect paddling a more
challenging boat does improve ones skills.  On the other hand, I suspect
most people would agree that each individual objective and person has
different requirements and that the skills required fit into a different
heirarchy. I believe, for instance, that my experience sailing 505's, Finns
and Flying Dutchman sailboats made me a much better keel boat sailor but I
know plenty of people who never ever sailed a dingy who sailed rings around
me in keel boats. Learning to right or keep upright a sailing dinghy is
important if one sails dinghies but the skill looses its importance if one
sails a keel boat.

>I just use the Nordkapp as an example.  Never paddled one.  But two boats
I
>have experience with in 20 knot down weather paddles are the Arluk II and
>Solstice GTS.  Both are 22 " beam, 18' and 17'7" length respectively.  I
>like both boats but the GTS is quite a bit easier handling down wind,
I.e.,
>more forgiving.  This seems to me "better".  What advantage is to be
gained
>from the less forgiving boat?

The "advantage" has to do with objectives. The question I would ask would
be, "What does the Arluk do better than the Solstice and when do you find
that more important to you than downwind handling in 20 knot winds?"

 Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Mon Oct 05 1998 - 05:49:17 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:29:59 PDT