PaddleWise by thread

From: Gerald Foodman <klagjf_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] High Performance, Stability, etc.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 21:24:09 -0700
John Winters wrote:
>
>On another note,  Ari mentioned capsizing his Nordkapp while learning to
>paddle it. I find it interesting that capsizing seems to be an integral
>part in learning how to paddle a boat that is reputed to be so seaworthy.
>It would be interesting to start another thread that defines what
>characteristics a high performance sea kayak would possess. I wonder if
>ease of capsize is one of them and wonder if the rest cannot be achieved
>with more stable boats.
>

Ari Saarto wrote:
>Again: I do think that "safe", stabile wider kayaks with
>more flat bottom can actually become a risk.  One starts to
>learn with them and finally learning of some basic skills
>might become more difficult. .....
>High performance?  To me it is safety combined to
>sensivity. A long expedition can be exhausting [which can
>be a safety problem ;-)] if your kayak resembles
>kitchen-sink...

A tireless expert like Paul Caffyn in his Australian/Nordkapp
circumnavigation is not likely to capsize in any boat.  But is not helpful
to compare narrow tippy boats only with wide kayaks resembling a kitchen
sink, as Ari does.  There are plenty of 22" or 23" beam kayaks that are
quite stable and comfortable, even in rough conditions.  Extra stability is
not detrimental unless the boat is so wide that you don't have a good grip
on your boat with your knees and hips, or that it makes leaning slow or
difficult.  I don't believe that any 22" or 23" boat is that stable.  Also,
boats of that width are not more difficult to roll than the very tippy ones.

For a non expert but competent paddler who likes to go out in moderately
rough, but not awful, conditions the extra stability brings higher
performance in the following sense:   I am far more confident in paddling
these moderately rough conditions in my stable 22 incher than in some of the
tippier boats I have tried.  I can surf, lean confidently, and remain in
control, instead of worrying about staying upright.  In the tippy boat I
stay inside the jetty, i.e., I get less performance out of it.

Also, very important for us older paddlers is pee performance.  Can you
remove the sprayskirt of your tippy boat in choppy conditions to do your
business?  It is easier to brace with the paddle in your hand than with that
other thing.

Jerry

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] High Performance, Stability, etc.
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 11:46:40 -0700
Gerald Foodman wrote:

> Extra stability is
> not detrimental unless the boat is so wide that you don't have a good grip
> on your boat with your knees and hips, or that it makes leaning slow or
> difficult.  

That is a good point.  I paddle mainly folding kayaks, particularly
singles. Their width varies from 25 inches to about 29 inches.  But most
of them have their width high up where the sponsons are and are actually
much narrower at the water line.  Moreover, the way the cockpit is
configured, most paddlers have lots of control of the boat with their
knees.

Take for example the Nautraid Raid 1 which I now own.  It is about 15.5
feet long and 29 inches wide.  But its cockpit rim is smaller than many
hardshells.  Moreover, your knees are in contact with ribs and deck. 
The sponsons are small and the boat's waterline width is around 23
inches and it leans amazingly easily.  All my turns and manuevering is
via lean, quite often quite drastic as the sponsons are very forgiving
of holding an extreme lean.  I am now trying to get the company to send
me a seat from another model which has inflatable hip pads built in,
which would give me even more contact with the boat.

> Also, very important for us older paddlers is pee performance.  Can you
> remove the sprayskirt of your tippy boat in choppy conditions to do your
> business?  It is easier to brace with the paddle in your hand than with that
> other thing.

Here is where the folding singles come into their own.  They are
virtually floating port-a-sans (have I opened myself up here to
derogatory comments by some wags? :-)).  You don't need to steady
yourself with a brace stroke.  It is safe to put your paddle down and
deal with business.  I carry a pee bottle and use it all the time.  I
have answered that call of nature under chop conditions in which people
around me in hard shells were using bracing strokes to steady themselves
without peeing.  I have never had a need to crap while on the water, but
I think it could be done under most situations, and again without
rafting up with a reluctant partner or figuring out how to hold a paddle
and paddle float, the container, toilet paper, etc.

Stability that doesn't drastically affect other aspects of paddling
should not be looked down on.

ralph diaz
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Ari Saarto <asaarto_at_lpt.fi>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] High Performance, Stability, etc.
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 13:48:35 +0300 (EET DST)
Hello you fellow paddlewisers again!
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Gerald Foodman wrote:

> to compare narrow tippy boats only with wide kayaks resembling a kitchen
> sink, as Ari does.  There are plenty of 22" or 23" beam kayaks that are
> quite stable and comfortable, even in rough conditions.  Extra stability is
> not detrimental unless the boat is so wide...
> (snip)
> For a non expert but competent paddler who likes to go out in moderately
> rough, but not awful, conditions the extra stability brings higher
> performance in the following sense:   I am far more confident in paddling
> these moderately rough conditions in my stable 22 incher than in some of the
> tippier boats I have tried.  I can surf, lean confidently, and remain in
> control, instead of worrying about staying upright.  In the tippy boat I
> stay inside the jetty, i.e., I get less performance out of it.
> 
> Also, very important for us older paddlers is pee performance.  Can you
> remove the sprayskirt of your tippy boat in choppy conditions to do your
> business?  It is easier to brace with the paddle in your hand than with that
> other thing.

Gerald, thanks for your comments!

Now, what is really "tippiness"? Is it a feeling of unstability
(when peeing as for an example ;-) or are we really talking about
possibility to capsize? To me essential things are, besides the width,
shape of the bottom combined to  kayakers weight.. a more rounded bottom
feels tippier than a flat bottom but makes leaning easier.  My point was
that learning might become more challenging and one might get more and
better results if the kayak has more secondary stability. Summer ´97 I
kayaked at sea more than 600 miles using my double and an old P&H Fjord,
which were both much wider than my Nordkapp. And had much more flatter
bottom. My capsizing in May was a combination of unfamiliarity
(differently designeded and narrower kayak) and  t r u s t i n g  t o o 
m u c h  to  the stability in general - too much flat bottomed kayaks with
too much primary stability.. 

My comment about kitchen sinks was meant to raise the subject of personal
choice and fitness on surface again.   I do miss sometimes the much more
stronger feeling of stability in P&H Fjord when kayaking in following
seas, but anyhow, Nordkapp did everything nice on last Thursday when I was
returning from my overnight trip (check my other mail on list about
Winter).  I had to paddle through some breaking waves in shallow waters
after leaving the island and trying to enter a channel safely.  The S - SE
wind was again blowing behind, from the open sea.

Hmm - I have made my choice, but it seems reasonable to believe that I am
not trying to do the same at the age of 50,  60 or 70 without checking if
some other kayak might then fit my needs better.

Safe paddling to all.

Ari

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:52 PDT