JCMARTIN43_at_aol.com wrote: > John brings up some good points --- and appropriate in light of the death of > "Rhino" Hancock on Lake Erie last Saturday. The most important question on > wet suits and dry suits --- and I'm not trying to open a thread on this, > necessarily --- is are you confident in swimming whatever you're wearing? And > <do> you swim what you wear periodically, as the water temps decline, to make > sure you're still confident that your equipment of choice will keep you > functional in cold water? Not comfortable, but functional. Well, you are starting a thread :-) There are definite schools of thought on safety gear and testing it under every condition. It certainly makes good sense to wear a dry suit, closed (that includes no neck rings that defeat the neck gasket), plenty of insulation, neoprene gloves and hood, etc. That is really the only outfit that can stand the 15 minute comfortable immersion test you had at the cold water shop last january. But I think we are getting to a worse-case scenario mania akin to the recent discussion of roof racks on this listserver where it came down to extra sets of straps and finally came down to bolting the boat bottom through the car roof. I am seeing a can-you-top-this attitude emerge in safety gear and preparation. An example is that paddle CPA had at near 70 degree air temperature and mid-60s water temperature and calm conditions in which people were stopped from paddling with the group if they had no cold water gear on. Leaders are free to set any standard they want and certainly hypothermia is a killer and you can die of it in 80 degree water if exposed long enough. But when is enough enough? I think you are right on the proper use of the gear. Rhino, if indeed his dry suit zipper were open, was defeating the way his gear worked. The same as the guy who died in NJ (was it?) who had a dry suit and just a bathing suit underneath. But there are levels of protection that will work. Your example of guys trying out their wet suits in the 30s degree water and becoming dry suit converts is a case in point. Their wet suits functioned. No, they were not up to a 15 minute comfortable swim but they were functional. Is it survival we are talking about or comfortably thriving in the cold water? If the criteria is to be happy and comfortable in the water for 15 minutes or more than certainly the lines are pretty clear. Wear a wet suit when water temperature drops below 70 degrees or so; immersion for prolonged periods while you are scared and away from shore in anything less would be uncomfortable. And a dry suit when it is below 60 or so. If the criteria is to be survivable, then the thresholds would be quite a bit lower. Don't get me wrong. I wear a dry suit when the water temperature drops below 45 degrees or so and a full wet suit below 55 degrees. Would I be happy at 50 in the wet suit? No. Would I survive and function, Yes, miserable but okay. The alternate would be to be uncomfortable for the hours and hours I would be paddling at those water temperatures in 60 degree air temperature conditions. ralph diaz -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024 Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com "Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed Dec 02 1998 - 07:37:51 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:01 PDT