PaddleWise by thread

From: Edward Sullivan <sullivaned_at_pop.mts.kpnw.org>
subject: [Paddlewise] VHF
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 17:53:31 -0800
In Barkley Sound in October I started thinking a VHF might be a nice
thing to have, as there was nobody around to see my aerial flares. My
ham buddy tells me VHF is line-of-sight range. I'm not sure I could have
raised the Coasties in Tofino if I'd needed to. There were occasional
fishing boats around, but had it been truly nasty, they probably would
have bolted.

I know it's a hail mary kinda gadget, but do I have a good chance of
getting heard when my Caribou has burned down to the waterline? Assuming
I'm out there.

Thanks,

Plays Well With Otters
(my new Lakota name)
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 19:29:03 -0800
Edward Sullivan wrote:
> 
> In Barkley Sound in October I started thinking a VHF might be a nice
> thing to have, as there was nobody around to see my aerial flares. My
> ham buddy tells me VHF is line-of-sight range. [snip]
> 
> I know it's a hail mary kinda gadget, but do I have a good chance of
> getting heard when my Caribou has burned down to the waterline? Assuming
> I'm out there.

I'm glad you raised the question, because the answer is a rather large "depends."

"Depends?"  On what, you ask?  

I think it depends on whether or not other *sea kayakers* leave their VHF's on, and tuned to Channel
16, the universal hailing/emergency channel.  Face it -- in places like Barkley Sound, the nearest
craft is a sea kayak, not a fishing vessel or a sailboat (and there are a lot of sea kayaks in
Barkley Sound!).  Yeah, sure, it would be better to reach the Coast Guard, or a motor vessel, but we
are probably the best "safety net" in places like Barkley Sound.  Same's true many other places I
paddle -- but not everywhere.

I believe the Canadian CG has a sizable antenna on a ridge overlooking Barkley Sound, so they
*might* pick up your weeny 5 Watt transmission from your handheld -- but that depends on good
line-of-sight to their antenna -- which is at least 5 - 8 miles off, depending on where you are on
Barkley Sound.  Eight miles is getting close to the *practical* range for a 5 Watt handheld
(assuming the standard rubber ducky antenna), though I have now and then gotten 8 miles
beach-to-beach, handheld to handheld, a tougher shot.

OTOH, I have *regularly* made successful transmissions to other handheld VHF's in the hands of sea
kayakers, also in their yaks, in the water, over a distance of 2 - 3 miles, sometimes *over an
intervening ridge.*  In Barkley Sound, that range probably includes a half dozen sea kayakers.

Now, if they only had their VHF's ON.  And, I bet they DON'T, because most sea kayakers (in my
experience) only turn the VHF on to listen to the weather, yak briefly at other yakkers, or to send
out a Mayday.  In other words, most of us are so selfish that we don't want to be part of the
"safety net" to help others -- but we DO expect somebody else to hear us, and respond.

How about it?  Do you leave your VHF on, tuned to 16 (and whatever "call" channel fits your area)
while paddling?  Bet you don't.

I'll collect responses and summarize the results -- no one needs to confess to the Paddlewise throng
they are selfish.  I promise to maintain confidentiality.  Just email me.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
--
P.S.  Most of my own paddling is in the Lower Columbia River, where I monitor 16 and 13 (shipping
traffic).  I think down here I could raise a pleasure craft, duck hunter, or maybe a pilot on a
freighter, but not a sea kayaker.  Not many of us around, and the area is too huge for me to expect
other sea kayakers to form a "safety net."  I also am able to monitor current conditions by
listening to the barge traffic and freighters exchange info.  I leave it on, down here, but have yet
to hear another sea kayaker asking for help.  Have heard lots of power boaters requesting aid from
the CG, however.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Richard Mitchell <mitchelr_at_ucs.orst.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 01:46:46 -0800
Dave:

Here is the first vote.  I *always* leave my VHF on and tuned to
16 regardless of where I'm paddling.  As you have seen, it is
carried in a waterproof bag in a right chest pocket on my PFD --
right below my right ear.  I adjust the squelch to just below
static level and listen in as I go along.  Weather alerts are
picked up this way, too.  There is not always a lot of chatter. 
During a week in the northern Charlottes in the fall I heard two
calls between fisherfolk (and none from kayakers).  
VHF has other advantages.  It is truly international -- the same
call rules and procedures apply in Greenland and Thailand, the
Great Lakes and Patagonia, and most power and sail craft *do*
keep 16 on.  I have a license, too.  Though it is not needed in
the US coastal waters it is in other countries.  You don't always
need to reach the coast guard directly (which may not be near, or
immediately concerned with kayakers) to get help.  Other boaters
can pass messages along quite effectively.  Your handheld VHF may
only have 5 watts and an 8" antenna but if there is a sailboat
within 3-5 miles they have 25 watts and a 40' antenna.  EPIRBS
require much longer response times (24-36 hours ?), are monitored
only by government agencies, and will not reach the very local
and at-hand help one often needs.  

Final note: the new generation of VHFs with digital tuning and
controls are a nightmare in an emergency if you are an old folk
like I am.  Instead of my M7's audible adjustments for squelch,
for example, my new and improved M3 now requires I get out the
reading glasses and visually set a squelch level, then return to
normal monitoring.  I believe all VHFs should be on and ready for
instant use, including use in the drink.  That is no time to be
looking for the "on" button.

Let's see what others do.

Rich


Dave Kruger wrote:
> 
> Edward Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > In Barkley Sound in October I started thinking a VHF might be a nice
> > thing to have, as there was nobody around to see my aerial flares. My
> > ham buddy tells me VHF is line-of-sight range. [snip]
> >
> > I know it's a hail mary kinda gadget, but do I have a good chance of
> > getting heard when my Caribou has burned down to the waterline? Assuming
> > I'm out there.
> 
> I'm glad you raised the question, because the answer is a rather large "depends."
> 
> "Depends?"  On what, you ask?
> 
> I think it depends on whether or not other *sea kayakers* leave their VHF's on, and tuned to Channel
> 16, the universal hailing/emergency channel.  Face it -- in places like Barkley Sound, the nearest
> craft is a sea kayak, not a fishing vessel or a sailboat (and there are a lot of sea kayaks in
> Barkley Sound!).  Yeah, sure, it would be better to reach the Coast Guard, or a motor vessel, but we
> are probably the best "safety net" in places like Barkley Sound.  Same's true many other places I
> paddle -- but not everywhere.
> 
> I believe the Canadian CG has a sizable antenna on a ridge overlooking Barkley Sound, so they
> *might* pick up your weeny 5 Watt transmission from your handheld -- but that depends on good
> line-of-sight to their antenna -- which is at least 5 - 8 miles off, depending on where you are on
> Barkley Sound.  Eight miles is getting close to the *practical* range for a 5 Watt handheld
> (assuming the standard rubber ducky antenna), though I have now and then gotten 8 miles
> beach-to-beach, handheld to handheld, a tougher shot.
> 
> OTOH, I have *regularly* made successful transmissions to other handheld VHF's in the hands of sea
> kayakers, also in their yaks, in the water, over a distance of 2 - 3 miles, sometimes *over an
> intervening ridge.*  In Barkley Sound, that range probably includes a half dozen sea kayakers.
> 
> Now, if they only had their VHF's ON.  And, I bet they DON'T, because most sea kayakers (in my
> experience) only turn the VHF on to listen to the weather, yak briefly at other yakkers, or to send
> out a Mayday.  In other words, most of us are so selfish that we don't want to be part of the
> "safety net" to help others -- but we DO expect somebody else to hear us, and respond.
> 
> How about it?  Do you leave your VHF on, tuned to 16 (and whatever "call" channel fits your area)
> while paddling?  Bet you don't.
> 
> I'll collect responses and summarize the results -- no one needs to confess to the Paddlewise throng
> they are selfish.  I promise to maintain confidentiality.  Just email me.
> 
> --
> Dave Kruger
> Astoria, OR
> --
> P.S.  Most of my own paddling is in the Lower Columbia River, where I monitor 16 and 13 (shipping
> traffic).  I think down here I could raise a pleasure craft, duck hunter, or maybe a pilot on a
> freighter, but not a sea kayaker.  Not many of us around, and the area is too huge for me to expect
> other sea kayakers to form a "safety net."  I also am able to monitor current conditions by
> listening to the barge traffic and freighters exchange info.  I leave it on, down here, but have yet
> to hear another sea kayaker asking for help.  Have heard lots of power boaters requesting aid from
> the CG, however.
> ***************************************************************************
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> ***************************************************************************

-- 
Richard G. Mitchell, Jr.
Department of Sociology
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97331
U.S.A.
(541) 752-1323 phone/fax
mitchelr_at_ucs.orst.edu
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Product Information Department <pid_at_mec.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF (and cell phones)
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 08:49:39 -0800
At 07:29 PM 12/1/98 -0800, Dave K wrote:
>How about it?  Do you leave your VHF on, tuned to 16 (and whatever "call"
channel fits your area)
>while paddling?  Bet you don't.
>
>I'll collect responses and summarize the results -- no one needs to
confess to the Paddlewise throng
>they are selfish.  I promise to maintain confidentiality.  Just email me.
>

Okay, colour me selfish, but most of the time I leave my VHF off. This
partially an aesthetic choice - I don't want to ruin the tranquility I came
for - and partially a functional one - I don't have an endless supply of
batteries. I could rationalize this by suggesting that any emergency that
took place over my horizon (that is, a crisis I might hear about on the VHF
that I would not otherwise have known about) I would take so long to get to
that my presence would make little difference. 
There are times I do monitor 16, but again mostly for selfish reasons. If
I'm crossing a major traffic lane, I contact Vessel Traffic Services on the
appropriate channel to confirm that it's safe to "cross the street" and to
advise them of my position and planned course. I then set the scanning on
the VHF to flip between the traffic channel and channel 16. Once clear, I
sign off with Traffic Services, and turn off the radio.

Re:cell phones. Not sure about the US. Here in Canada, in some areas you
can hit *16 on a cell phone and be directly connected to the Coast Guard
rescue. However the Coast Guard still prefers that you use VHF channel 16
if possible - the idea being that other boats in the immediate vicinity may
hear you, speeding up response time and possibly making it unnecessary for
the increasingly under funded Coasties to respond at all.


Philip T. 

****************************************
Mountain Equipment Co-op
1655 West 3rd Avenue,
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6J 1K1
Tel: 640-732-1989
Fax: 604-731-6483
email: pid_at_mec.ca

Visit our website at: http://www.mec.ca
*****************************************
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <VajraT_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF (and cell phones)
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 22:58:21 EST
In the US, (at least in Maine), cellular phone users can reach the Coast Guard
by dialing *CG.

Canadian Coast Guard in Saint John, New Brunswick is listed at *16.

The direct connection to Coast Guard SAR offices seems like a strong advantage
for cell phones in emergencies.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Edward Sullivan <sullivaned_at_pop.mts.kpnw.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 08:58:38 -0800
>  (and there are a lot of sea kayaks in
> Barkley Sound!).  

Actually, (and delightfully) I had the sound to myself, except for two
kayakers I chatted up as they paddled by my camp on Dodd on the first
evening. And an occasional fishing boat.  Wonderous and a little spooky.

For Mr. Martin: How does an EPIRB compare in size and weight? Can it run
on AA batteries (I try to standardize all battery appliances for
swappage in emergency).
  And I-thought-I-might-shouldn't-be-out-in-October, but the weather
broke, I had a forecast for three days of nice, I was in Tofino and
could not resist. 

Somebody else said: "EPIRB require much longer response times (24-36
hours ?)" ???? Why so long? I really prefer same-day service when I am
bobbing.


As always
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Product Information Department <pid_at_mec.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 09:43:26 -0800
At 08:58 AM 12/2/98 -0800, Edward wrote:
>Somebody else said: "EPIRB require much longer response times (24-36
>hours ?)" ???? Why so long? I really prefer same-day service when I am
>bobbing.
>
One reason is that the false alarm rate with EPIRBs is about 90%. The Coast
Guard may wait several hours before responding just to be sure it's for
real. This situation should improve as traceable EPIRBs with their unique
coded signals replace those that just send out "generic" signals. 
The second reason: In areas where there is not yet continuous satellite
coverage, your EPIRB signal is not detected until a satellite happens to
pass overhead. It then records your signal, but does not download it to SAR
stations until it passes over one of those. As satellite coverage improves,
EPIRB signals will be able to be received in "real time". Even so I expect
the response time will still be longer than if you were able to contact
someone nearby on VHF 16. So, although I carry an EPIRB, I don't count on
it for situations where I might swimming - I think of it more for
situations where I might be stranded ashore with a dislocated shoulder, for
example, able to hold out for a couple of days, but unable to proceed under
my own power.
While we're talking EPIRBs, I notice Breitling-Orbiter
(www.breitling-orbiter.ch) is making a watch with a built-in 121.5 MHz
beacon. The ultimate X-mas gift for the tech-weenie kayaker on your list?

Cheers
Philip T. 


****************************************
Mountain Equipment Co-op
1655 West 3rd Avenue,
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6J 1K1
Tel: 640-732-1989
Fax: 604-731-6483
email: pid_at_mec.ca

Visit our website at: http://www.mec.ca
*****************************************
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Julio MacWilliams <juliom_at_cisco.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 10:59:30 -0800 (PST)
(Answering to the question of whether I leave my VHF on while paddling)

Not anymore. I used to do that every time, but after several day long
trips in the San Francisco Bay I decided to turn it off. The VHF
traffic inside the bay is very heavy, and I would get distracted all
the time.

Most of the VHF traffic inside the SF Bay is irrelevant to kayakers.
The only relevant message I have ever heard was "group of paddlers,
can you hear me?". Since the Coast Guard had announced a few minutes
before a paddle race under the Golden Gate, I waited for a second
transmition to make sure it was for us. That second retransmition
never came, so either the originator does not know the VHF protocol,
or it was not for us.

Personally, I would like to announce on Ch 16, something like
"group of sea kayakers are about to cross Racoon Straight, please
 exercise caution" just like the Coast Guard does. However, I have
been afraid to do so because the Coast Guard might not like it, or
most boaters would just ignore it.

What are your opinions on that?  Should I go ahead and announce
our presence on Ch 16?


Another thing I have noticed is that around here, people do not use
the VHF protocol that appears in the (at least) European boat licensing
books. In those books it says that the correct protocol is

<the called destination three times> this is < your identifier three times>
<message>

(mayday, mayday relay, pan, and other parts of the protocol ommitted)

And a call should be repated 2 times every 30 seconds (or so) if there
is no answer.

I guess in the US the VHF protocol is "clear talk"; something like
"hey you!" "yeah?..."  that gives no clue as to who is using the channel.

So, do you think that a message like "attention [all boaters (3 times)],
this is [sea kayakers (3 times)], we are about to cross Racoon straight,
please use caution", would be an overkill?


While it is my turn to speak :-) Let me tell you from personal experience
that both cellular phones, and VHF radios, are useless when paddling
close to a cliff; the signal does not go anywhere. 

I have found short wave to be much more reliable in that situation, which
is all very common in coastal sea kayaking. The signal travels upward
and bounces between the sky and the ground, going away many miles.
The only drawback is that the Coast Guard does not have to monitor
short wave all the time, but, hey, it is better than nothing.

Finding a short wave side band handheld radio might be a challenge, though, and
installing one of the full size ones inside the hull probably requires
some skill.

Your thoughts and experiences? please?

- Julio
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 17:21:20 -0800
Julio MacWilliams wrote:
> 
> (Answering to the question of whether I leave my VHF on while paddling)
> 
> Not anymore. I used to do that every time, but after several day long
> trips in the San Francisco Bay I decided to turn it off. The VHF
> traffic inside the bay is very heavy, and I would get distracted all
> the time.

I can appreciate that VHF use in a high-traffic area would be different than in an isolated area
like Barkley Sound.  I know how annoying it is to hear the constant yammering of the Neanderthal
segment of the power boat crowd.  We get that here during part of the summer, when the salmon
(remember them?) season is open.

> Most of the VHF traffic inside the SF Bay is irrelevant to kayakers.[snip]

> Personally, I would like to announce on Ch 16, something like
> "group of sea kayakers are about to cross Racoon Straight, please
>  exercise caution" just like the Coast Guard does. However, I have
> been afraid to do so because the Coast Guard might not like it, or
> most boaters would just ignore it.
> 
> What are your opinions on that?  Should I go ahead and announce
> our presence on Ch 16?

Yes.  Do it.  Usually this would be a "Securite'" call, I believe.  Professional mariners such as
tug captains and freighter drivers will appreciate the heads-up, and will normally make a serious
effort to locate you (visually -- we are nothing on radar).  For many waters, we have no protection
aside from avoiding shipping channels.  When you have to cross a shipping channel in traffic, the
call is a good idea.  In some areas, there is a shipping traffic coordinator channel you can contact
to see if anything heavy is headed your way.  YMMV

> Another thing I have noticed is that around here, people do not use
> the VHF protocol that appears in the (at least) European boat licensing
> books. In those books it says that the correct protocol is[snip]
> 
> I guess in the US the VHF protocol is "clear talk"; something like
> "hey you!" "yeah?..."  that gives no clue as to who is using the channel.

Bozo-speak is bozo-speak, no matter the culture or nationality.  Unfortunately, in high-traffic
areas such as yours, Julio, "average" marine VHF courtesy is at the pre-Neanderthal stage.  In other
areas (mine is one), most of transmissions are between professional mariners, who still exercise
correct radio protocol, and gentlemanly politeness, also.  Maybe one of the last refuges of the
civilized!

In my limited experience in remote areas, where the VHF is the ONLY (best?) way villages/fishing
vessels/yakkers/packet freighters/outfitters/etc. can communicate, protocol is informal, but
respectful.  In the Charlottes, for example, locals use channel 6 (yeah, they know they are supposed
to use a different channel) as the "party line," for all sorts of communication.  Makes for a nice
way to keep in touch with those around you, when you need to.  When you want silence, you can have
that, also.  They all monitor 6 and 16.  Almost nobody uses 16 for hailing, freeing it for emergency
traffic.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:53 PDT