Re: [Paddlewise] volume and safety

From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:38:06 -0500
Michael wrote;



>The person we need here is John Winters; he's said that stability
>is one of his favorite topics.  He's also explained broaching in a
>way that is easy for me to understand.

AWWW Shucks.

Like so many things in boat design volume can have a positive or a negative
effect just as stability can cause problems as well as solve them.

In a better world boats would be designed as system with every part or
factor balanced to produce a given result. The better world having not yet
arrived we do the best we can with what we have.

The problem we face is that a person having a bad experience with a type of
boat might assume that a particular factor (high or low volume for example)
is a "bad" thing when the problem may have been how the volume was
distributed.

A simple example;

Imagine a boat with X volume but having "U" shaped sections with vertical
sides It will probably pound and be slow. Now imagine the same volume boat
with "V'd" sections that have a concave side. It will probably pearl and
plunge deeply into waves. Clearly how the boat gets shaped affects the way
the boat performs.

Now imagine a full ended high volume boat with "V'd" sections tapering up
to a chine. It might not pound at all and may have enough lift when
immersed deeply to prevent pearling. Now imagine a fine ended boat with
spray rails or a flaring topsides. It might do the same thing. Simply put,
one can achieve the same thing in many ways.

The issue of control also lends itself to a multitude of solutions. One can
approach control as something that one does with the paddle I.E. a short
rockered boat.  One can also approach it as a long boat with excellent
directional stability that will not allow the boat to waver from the
desired course. Both approaches work for specific goals.

All this applies to stability. Some features (high initial stability
coupled with low displacement)  can be dangerous in some conditions but it
can also be advantageous in others. The great sponson war erupted because
people claimed that sponsons were all good or all bad. In truth they had
good features and bad features and so long as one did not assume they made
everyone safe all the time you might get some benefit form them. Boats with
low initial stability have value in those conditions and circumstances
where that proves useful but the blanket statement that the characteristics
is always best simply doesn't hold water.

Not much help other than to emphasise that what one wants may not have
anything  to do with what one gets.

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/
.






***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Wed Feb 24 1999 - 05:45:37 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:04 PDT