In a message dated 3/28/99 6:14:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, Tomckayak_at_aol.com writes: << The measure of a Sea kayaker is not the extreme conditions he/she can paddle in but the rough conditions they can still assist others. "Joe Black is a Force 6 paddler but only a Force 3 rescuer" At what point are you more concerned with staying up right and getting out of a situation then you are about others? >> Tom, I love it!! Your force-rating for rescue skills strikes me as a powerfully poignant way of expressing an all-too-frequent problem. I _will_ find a way to incorporate it into my instruction -- thank you for such an elegant teaching tool. If your partners rated Force 6 paddle skills and Force 3 rescue skills, they also rated Force 0 pod skills for their demonstrated lack of concern for your safety and welfare. I wonder if those individuals would walk off and leave their friends, mothers and children alone and unsupported in a dark Los Angeles alley if they could not, or would not keep up? I would hazard to estimate that most paddlers are at least 2 or 3 Beaufort numbers lower in pod skills (those skills relating to rescues, group dynamics, leadership, followership, and other areas needed to qualify as a positive, contributing addition to a paddling pod) than in their raw paddling skills. Further, while a large percentage of paddlers might leave their first introductory SK classes rating a solid F1 or F2 in both areas, the gap between those skills usually continues to widen as they practice paddling skills every time they kayak, but rarely (if ever) practice rescues, group dynamics and the like. This may apply somewhat less to those who actively participate in club or group activities where the group is strongly safety-conscious and willing to tutor the initiate. And it may apply less in those areas of the world where people are raised riding Gotham's subways instead of Disney's Matterhorn, or where kids are routinely warned about the bears, alligators or pumas in the back yard, but I still expect it is more prevalent than I would hope. The incidents in _Deep Trouble_ and other tales of mishap and death usually involve glaring failures in proper pod protocol. This fact is telling us that many don't get the picture, even though only a relative few ever pay the price. Tom, although it took some time, I'm glad you replied to this old thread. I have been watching to see how much would come of it, and I've been both surprised and saddened that only about 9 people contributed anything. I know that this subject has probably been drummed to death before, but how many responses do we routinely see about Canadian Ballast and GPS's and other equipment? Why not the same interest in safety? All the GPS and VHF and BFD equipment in the world may not save you when the ax falls, while one good partner who stayed by your side could save your life. Off-line I've been corresponding lately with a friend in Northern Cal who is going through the agony of discovering that her paddling group cannot be depended upon. Though they say they are committed to the safety of one- another, they routinely lose contact with individuals, spontaneously split into smaller groups which leaves less-qualified paddlers grouped together and unsupported, and make the assumption that someone who has split off has done so deliberately and couldn't be having any problems. I see this kind of thing all the time, and I empathize with all those paddlers out there who have felt various levels of dread, fear, or just plain loneliness upon realizing they have been cut lose by their partners, left to paddle or die. I remember a few times when I had to deal with the extreme disappointment in my own partners when they assumed I'd be OK and left me to fend for myself. The protocols stated in the other posts on this thread are all well known and valid. And if they work in your group, then I say "congratulations" but I also think you either have a very sophisticated and caring group, or a looser interpretation of what constitutes proper pod behavior than I. If you are blessed with such a group, then perhaps the question is: What about those times when you find yourself in a new, unsophisticated or uncooperative group? How do you make all those wonderful protocols work when people don't listen when you *do* communicate? when people can't agree on what "keeping together" means? when, in spite of all you do, they still insist on doing what they want to do, regardless of the group welfare? What say you all? What real experiences have you had that tell the difference? Now leaving my soapbox in So. Cal., Harold :-) *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Mar 30 1999 - 16:41:15 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:06 PDT