Re: [Paddlewise] hardshell/foldable debate

From: <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 11:57:02 -0700
N.D. VAN LOO wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> We have a simple question: Can anyone convince us that buying a
> foldable double instead of a hardshell is a stupid and crazy idea?

It _is_ a stupid and crazy idea.  Why would you want to buy a folding
kayak?  It would just put you in a kayak with a long distinguished
pedigree of thousands of expedition accomplishments on ever waterway and
large body of water from the Arctic to Antarctica and everywhere in
between.  Who would want to paddle a kayak that is the choice of such
dainty, sissy paddlers as special operations forces the world over
including those in your native Netherlands?  Need I go on?  It is a
crazy idea, folding kayaks are no good; they are not even kayaks, just,
ugh, "boats".  Give it up!  :-) 
 
> When asking around to some " more experienced" kayakers, they all
> told us about their favourite hardshell brands and their moste loved
> types. At an outdoor exibition we saw a presentation of Klepper and
> fell in love immediately. So we started to look around more carefully
> at the internet and  we read a couple of  "standard books" on
> seakayaking  and kayaking in general.

I know, I know.  That is just my point.  If experienced paddlers say
that the hardshells are better you should listen to them.  I remember
when well before I decided to write a book on folding kayaks, I asked an
author of one of those leading seakayaking books why he had said such
bad things about folding kayaks.  He fumbled for an answer and said that
is what "people" say about the boats and it turns out he had never been
in one.  
  
> 
> To cut a long story short, our conclusion (for the moment) is:
> We want a foldable because its larger safety margin and foldability.
> We consider Feathercraft/Klepper/Nautiraid doubles. Among these the
> Klepper expedition (red colour) is the favourite.
> 
> This conclusion when presented at the kayak club gave rise to quite
> some resistance. Foldables were "not done". When we asked: "Could
> you give any logical reason why a foldable is a bad idea?" The debate
> focussed on, stability, preformance, vurnerability to rocks,
> maintenance, folding/unfolding time etc. But most of our kayaking
> friends had no experience at all with foldables.

Folding kayaks are much too stable; that makes them boring in heavy seas
and takes away from the enjoyment of having to use all your bracing and
rolling skills to survive.  They don't perform well except in rough
conditions.  All those major open water crossing over the last 90 years
including the Atlantic were just flukes, meaning exceptions.  Yes, they
are extremely vulnerable despite being able to be dropped from
helicopters fully loaded from 20 feet up and crashed against enemy
shores in the blackness of night loaded with a half ton of gear. 
Maintenance: the instructions say that you should varnish each year;
those who never varnish like me, will not get the 70 years of life out
of the frames just perhaps 30 years because of our unwise
non-maintenance laziness.  And that Klepper, it takes all of 10 minutes
for two people to make; that is so much longer than putting a hardshell
kayak on a roofrack (assuming the rack is always in place), strapping
and tying it down, then untying and removing it from the roof at your
paddling place.  You are much better off in a hardshell that doesn't
require assembly at some point.  So what if you can't ship the latter
anywhere except by special arrangement and at enormous cost or it
depreciates 50 per cent in value within the first two years.  Folding
kayaks go as ordinary baggage everywhere and keep their value far too
well; who would want those things.

> We are curious to learn from people that have experience
> with both foldables and hardshells. Could any of them please tell us
> why we are so wrong?

You are totally wrong.  Afterall it is what people say.  :-) :-) :-)

ralph diaz

p.s. Paddlewise, our Dutch friends who asked the questions know I am
doing this tongue-in-cheek. 
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Fri Apr 09 1999 - 08:58:52 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:06 PDT