-(SNIP) >I appreciate all the input on this subject, especially from the boat >designers. I need to go back and reread the posts about the flooding >question, because I always assumed that the sponson would increase edge >buoyancy and thus righting moment, beyond that contributed by hull shape, >when flooded. I reasoned that, since there was water surrounding the bottom >and sides of the chamber, the chamber is displacing water toward the center >and ends of the craft. Should this not add buoyancy and righting moment to >the edge of the craft, or does the entrapped air know its inside the boat and >refuse to do its duty? I would love to see a clear analysis of this. Matt, >John, guys? Inquiring minds of limited reasoning (mine) need to know. I hope this helps. First, consider a boat heeling say 10 degrees. As it heels the center of buoyancy (CB) shifts outboard. If the Center of Gravity (CG) remains constant and the CB lies outside a line drawn vertically through the CG a righting moment results that acts to bring the boat back to level. Now, take the paddler out and replace his weight with water (Ignore for the time being the relative heights of the center of gravity) . As the boat heels the water flows downhill seeking its own level and shifting the center of gravity thus reducing or even wiping out the righting moment created by the shifting center of buoyancy and the boat now has less stability Now, add internal buoyancy tanks down the side. If the center of gravity remains fixed as in the first example the righting moment will equal the righting moment of the first example regardless of the presence of the tanks since the tanks do not affect the shift in the CB. Now replace the paddler with water of the same weight and heel the boat. This time the water cannot flow as far downhill and seeks its own level closer to the centerline of the boat. If the tanks encompass enough volume, the CB will lie outside the new center of gravity providing a positive righting moment. Of course, the tanks might also reduce the amount of water to enter the boat with a further positive benefit. Now let us repeat the example but this time we will use a bulkhead running fore and aft at the same location as the air tanks. The bulkhead though will have 3/8" holes in it. As the boat heels the water will flow more slowly through the holes than if unconstrained and the boat will actually have more stability even though there are no sealed tanks. Now we will replace the water with ball bearings equal in weight to our paddler or water. This time when the boat heels the ball bearings are held in a similar position to the water in the boat with tanks. The result is a boat with the same stability as a tanked boat. By this experiment we can see that the stability effect of tanks has to do with its restriction of water flow in the boat . The material of the boat or tanks matters not so long as it does its job in restricting the flow of water to the down side of the boat. Anti roll tanks on ships use the principle of the holed bulkhead to reduce roll in ships. Now, imagine another boat. with no water in it that has "x"righting moments. The righting moment is the product of the righting arm (distance for the vertical projection of the CG and the CB. If we add water and it sloshes to the low side we get both a shift in weight and the effect of the shift (inertia). This we call free surface effect. The farther the water has to travel the greater its inertia and so we can see how restricting its travel reduces the capsizing moment of water in the boat. I have simplified this enormously but hope it helps. Entire books devoted to stability and damage stability in particular have been written. Cheers, John Winters Redwing Designs Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft http://home.ican.net/~735769/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Apr 12 1999 - 17:13:38 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:06 PDT