On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Gerald Foodman wrote: > > Kevin, > I don't at all understand how you consider a Greenland like a wing. I have > a commercial Greenland (by Mark Rogers of Superior Kayaks) and have tried > wing wing paddles. They couldn't be more different. What am I missing? > Are you joking? What do you mean by modern wing technique with a Greenland? > Don't you use a very low flat stroke with the Greenland? A greenland paddle technically is a wing, since it has a symmetrical foil shape which produces forward lift if paddled in the right way. This has been discussed before on Paddlewise. Modern wing technique means to use a very high angle, extended arm stroke just like modern kayak races use with modern wing paddles. I think the amount of lift generated is significant in this way, although I have not tested it against a modern wing paddle. As Tim suggested in another post, this was an informative joke... Sort of. I do think that a Greenland is the best kind of paddle for sea kayaking period, and I think I shall need to test a good Greenland paddle against a racing wing paddle this summer. I certainly consider a Greenland paddle to be a symmetrical wing paddle, and a modern racing wing paddle to be an asymmetrical wing. > > And what do you mean by properly constructed Greenland? What is wrong with > the Mark Rogers paddles? Two main things. One, a Greenland paddle should have a much thicker cross-section than commericial paddles, and it should have a diamond shape everywhere except at the tips of the blade. This generates more lift. Two, it should have the "thumb-bumps" at the base of the blades, which allows for automatic indexing when using a sliding stroke. According to George Gronseth, who has been to a Greenland kayaking camp, these are not minor points. > > (I liked the Greenland but now use an AT, which seems to me better in every > way, except cost, where it is MUCH worse.) > I also really like the AT paddle, but I would not consider it better than my greenland paddle in any way except perhaps in surf, where blade area is more important than efficiency. I would probably get an AT sea kayak paddle to keep my AT whitewater paddle company if it weren't for the prohibitive cost. > Another question: Do you use a very short "Storm" Greenland, with sliding > stroke, for storm paddling? It seems to me that even the usual Greenland > length of 7' is too short for rough water paddling. I prefer 7'6". > My Greenland paddle is 7'6", although I made it a little bit longer to compensate for reduced width in the blades -- I used a finished 2x4 as a blank. I use a sliding stroke, a wing type stroke, and a high-efficiency stroke all interchangeably, although I prefer the high-efficiency stroke for general cruising, and the wing for accelerating and catching waves. I use the sliding stroke as a muscle-relaxer. I am REALLY looking forward to paddling with Maligiaq this coming weekend at the Anacortes skin kayak festival. Cheers, Kevin *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Apr 20 1999 - 11:24:13 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:07 PDT