[Paddlewise] Need for new launch or take out sites in the San Juans - Orcas joins Shaw and Lopez as no longer available

From: Saul Kinderis <saul_at_isomedia.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 05:47:11 -0700
Dear Paddlewisers - or is it Dear Wise Paddlers?,

I thought I should pass on some updated information launch or take out sites
in the San Juan Islands in Washington State, as well as find out if anyone
had any ideas on how to change the situation. Someone with a wicked sense of
humor might call this "revenge" of the PWC, since many of us supported the
county council a few years back, when they banned PWC, but now, while we can
paddle in peace and quiet, it's hard to get there.

Most of my San Juan trips start in Anacortes, so I just put in at one of the
many boat launches and paddle across the shipping lanes in Guemes Channel
and in Rosario Strait, but on some of my higher mileage trips I like to
catch the ferry for the return leg. My trip this weekend started in
Anacortes, and by the time I hit the dock at Orcas, I had put in over 45
miles in 3 days and would have needed to paddle another 12-15 in a weird
weather system that seemed to be a few hours of high winds, followed by a
few hours of calm, all weekend long, to get back.

The problem is that over the last 5-10 years we have lost launch/take out
sites that are near the ferry docks - i.e. within 1 kilometer or a bit over
1/2 mile on all of the ferry stops except the one at Friday Harbor on San
Juan Island. I believe the next closest take out to a ferry dock would be
the one at Odelin Park on Lopez, which about 2 hilly miles from the ferry.

Some of this has occurred as a result of the rise in popularity of the
sport, the lack of economic impact it represents (i.e. most kayakers don't
buy food or fuel from places where they use the facilities such as
launching, toilets, garbage, etc., don't pay boat registration fees, don't
join lobbying organizations, etc.) and the tendency of kayakers to tie up
launch areas and docks by slow staging, as well as a few instances of brain
dead or "dane bread" (apologies to any Bakers of Danish Origin on the list)
boating.

A result of this is that in addition to the loss of the "convenient" launch
sites, we no longer have "easy to use" foul weather "bail out" options. This
leads to my next concern, which is the safety implications of needing to
cross Rosario Strait or San Juan Channel even in inclement weather. I
realize that this skips the options of not going to the islands or just
staying put until the storm blows over - if you're waiting for a favorable
current direction, and winds under 15 or even 20 knots or waiting for the
fog to burn off, you shouldn't be stuck for more than a few days. With the
number of people kayaking the area these days I can't help but think that
this will result in more deaths as a result of people doing a Sunday
afternoon - "gotta get back for work" - crossing.

While all the beaches that are owned by the Ferry system have been closed to
kayak launches and take outs for about 10 years (allegedly for safety - even
when the beach was well away from and faced in a different direction than
the ferry dock - and you can still land on these beaches to drop off
passengers, you just can't take a kayak out (the signs don't mention canoes,
so that may be another option)), Orcas has had a private boat dock that used
to accept kayakers at $5 per boat each way. As of 1999, they no longer
accept kayakers, since the reason for building the dock is for refueling
boats, and as a result they lose revenue when we tie up the docks.

I also know that gaining access to public property on the easiest site, Shaw
Island, is out of the question, due to strong local opposition (the state
had at one time owned a sand beach (even gravel beaches are rare here) that
was about 50 yards from the ferry terminal, and was slated to become a
marine park for kayakers, but was sold to a group of local islanders to keep
this from happening). This leaves Orcas and Lopez, as the other two
candidates. I'd guess that Orcas would be the path of least resistance, and
could see the cheapest solution being a ramp on the private fuel company
property built to the beach (this would keep the kayakers off of the float),
while it wouldn't work at high tide - the beach is at the base of a cliff,
and gets submerged at high tide, my guess is that it could be done for less
than $10,000 USD. Another option would be to aquire access at Dolphin Bay,
about 1/4 mile east of the dock, this wouldn't require any ramps since the
road basically goes down the hill to the beach, but I suspect that the
marina would be worried about kayakers, sailors, and power boaters mixing. -
Right now , they have many No Tresspassing and No Kayak Launching Signs, and
I suspect may not like kayakers a whole lot. Either of these two sites may
get some support from the Hotel, Restuarants, and Grocery stores near the
ferry dock, since the many residents of the nearby islands that don't have
ferry service, were also used to using the same fuel dock to do their
shopping, and can no longer do so.

So now my question???
Does anyone in this group know if anyone is working on getting this
situation changed? Maybe lobbying for a new park? or lobbying for legalized
access for launching at the various pieces of nearby public property? Maybe
even working a financial deal with the fuel company to allow some type of
use of their property? Any other ideas?


Thanks - Saul


Saul Kinderis
saul_at_isomedia,com
My new web page is at:  http://www.isomedia.com/homes/saul
(425)402-3426
POB 2221, Bothell, WA, 98041

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Jun 01 1999 - 05:40:45 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:09 PDT