I use Microsoft Outlook 97 for e-mail. The Reply to All button sends the reply to all the recipients of the original message, not to everyone in the address book. When I use the Reply button, extra characters get added to the subject line (which might be the fault of my company's LAN rather than Outlook), so I usually use the Forward button and then insert the address for Paddlewise from the address book. Chuck Holst -----Original Message----- From: Steve Cramer [mailto:cramer_at_coe.uga.edu] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 3:01 PM To: Paddlewise Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Replying to Paddlewise Shawn Baker wrote: > > > and I have been afraid to use "Reply to all" for fear I will email > > everyone in my address folder with what I am sending to paddlewise. > You're right--that would happen! If so, IE is dumber than I thought. In Netscape, the choices are "Reply to Sender" and "Reply to Sender and all Recipients". I usually use the latter, then take out the sender's name, so he/she won't get two copies. Could IE users say whether "Reply to all" really means "reply to everyone who got a copy of this message I'm replying to"? I think it does, but what makes sense and Microsoft are two different things. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/ ***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:59 PDT