Re: [Paddlewise] QCC and length...

From: M. Wagenbach <wagen_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Wes wrote:
All the negative rake on the turn of the last century battleships was
because the bows were actually rams. The designers in those days weren't
all that confident about gunfire against armor, and designed the potential
for a ramming battle into the ships.

Me:
Do you know if this was ever tested???  It's hard to imagine riveted 
construction holding tight after being used to ram.  Hope they included some
monster pumps in the design!

Just to pick nits, I noticed a couple of months ago that on the QCC "How long.."
page, the Mariner Coaster was somewhat farther down the list than I expected
to find a boat which is the first that comes to my mind when "short overhangs"
are mentioned.  The table lists it at 91%, while calculating from the figures
on the Mariner web site gives 94%.  Perhaps if *Cam* Broze was reading this
list, this would have been mentioned earlier ;-)

Mike Wagenbach
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Jul 27 1999 - 17:21:52 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:11 PDT