PaddleWise by thread

From: Philip Torrens <skerries_at_hotmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] sleeping bags
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 08:47:47 PDT
Hope you won't mind some comments on this from someone who works for an 
outdoor retailer (I'm not trying to flog you any particular product - these 
are general observations.) You're right about bag temperature ratings not 
being absolutes, Wes. Two main factors at work here, each of includes a 
number of sub-variables:

1. Sleepers and their circumstances vary tremendously; metabolism and 
general fitness level and immediate health vary, as do how well fed, 
watered, and rested sleepers are (now there's cruel paradox - if you're too 
tired, you can't get a proper sleep.) Ambient humidity, wind chill, and 
other local climate effects can make you cold far above a bag's "official" 
rating. I've had the memorable experience of shivering uncontrollably in a 
bag rated to minus 10 Celsius during a summer day - however, as I later 
realised, I was seriously underfed, dehydrated, and tired, plus the air was 
extremely damp, with a local katabatic wind too slow to be heard, but fast 
enough to drain heat.
The best way to protect yourself here is to know your own metabolism, and to 
"overbuy" if needed.

2. Unlike say, car gas mileages, there is not a current and compulsory 
industry standard testing method for sleeping bags. Many of the major 
players in the US and Canada are currently working to agree on one, which 
will be based around a US military testing method for CLO ratings -  
basically a copper dummy wired with thermometers, in a chamber of controlled 
temperature, moisture, and airflow. Some manufacturers are already using 
this method as one factor in establishing their ratings. The best bet here 
is to buy a brand with an established reputation - if they've been around 
for decades, they must be doing something right. As you noted, manufacturers 
are tempted to be optimistic with the ratings, and personally, I think a 
single number is misleading anyway. Although it would be more expensive to 
test for (and to agree on standards for) I think a range (e.g. "Zero to 
Minus Ten") encompassing best and worst case scenarios (and bell curved for 
the statistically inclined) would be the most honest and informative 
approach.

My opinion - worth what you paid for it. Hope it's of some interest.
Philip Torrens
N49°16' W123°06'


> >Buying too much bag not only costs more money, but it is harder to pack 
>and
> >usually less comfortable to sleep in.
> >
>
>Yeah, unless you tend to sleep cold anyway, and/or you believe the bag
>ratings, which are pretty optimistic. I have a 20 degree rated bag that's
>chilly at 40, for me, anyway.
>
>-- Wes



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:01 PDT