Another writer mentioned, regarding the heart-rate monitors which are worn while exercising, that "Some of the monitors record calories burned during excercise..." These estimates of calorie consumption are the vaguest of guesses, based not on direct measurement of energy expended but on average estimated expenditure which in turn is derived from other averages.....and so on. Simple heart-rate monitors are very helpful to record heart rate as such, which is what they're really designed for and all they really do with accuracy. All the other data are derived from the heart rate. They're fun to fool around with and they're nice distractions if you're bored with your daily run or treadmill time (or even your daily self-torture on the computerized multi-program "bicycling" or machine at the local fitness center. But they don't really measure calories, and are often quite inaccurate. Matt Broze correctly points out that "....you can measure calories burned by oxygen uptake ...." It takes a much fancier machine than a hearrt rate monitor to measure oxygen uptake directly. Incidentally, my experience with heart rate and paddling is the same as Tom C's: my heart rate won't go up into "the zone" unless I'm paddling *really* hard. Those arm muscles, even the back and abdominal muscles, we use for paddling just aren't nearly as big as those used for walking or running. (Sadly, that's especially true for my personal arm and back muscles.) Bill Hansen *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Sep 03 1999 - 06:03:16 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:12 PDT