Dave wrote; . > >I was just getting off the water at 1 pm PDT (4 pm EDT), some 20 miles east of >the place these weather parameters were recorded, when the front hit. Even >though this was a small front, conditions changed quickly from mild, mill pond >stuff to 2-3 foot wind waves and moderate rain (where I was). > >Note that there was **very little** pressure change to signal the front. > >The front *was* predicted by the NWS (although prediction of the time of its >arrival was vague) and could be seen approaching about an hour before it hit. >Somebody with his head in a tent, watching the barometer, would have been >*almost clueless* about the front's approach. OTOH, there was a definite >temperature change, and an obvious change in wind direction and speed. As Dave has shown, one cannot rely upon one weather indicator. To get a good picture of weather change one needs to keep track of wind, waves, temperature, etc. Even then you can make a mistake. The barometer provides additional information that in conjunction with other signs improves your accuracy. Even though a barometer by itself cannot predict the weather (Ambrose Bierce defined a barometer as "An ingenious instrument which indicates what kind of weather we are having.") I think paddlers can find them useful when combining the pressure trends with their observations of wind etc. The El Cheapo models won't bankrupt a paddler either. ETC. Cheers, John Winters Redwing Designs Web site address, http://home.ican.net/~735769 *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Sep 06 1999 - 05:48:10 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:12 PDT