Bayside Bob does not seem convinced, just yet, that there is a kayaking "explosion." As a small business owner in the industry I would like to reassure him, "It's happening, Bob." I also agree with Woody, there are a lot of kayaks with bottom sides that never get wet. I am an agreeable guy today, Matt wrote that the boom right now is in the plastic recreational kayaks. This is an industry fact. I think that these are the people that the good Reverend referred to as the "first milers," people who paddle within a mile or so of the launch site. They are the masses. They are also the group which will take the pursuit less "seriously," initially at least. And IMHO create the most impact. I do not intend to offend this group, these are my professional observations. As part of the recreational segment, they do not seek training and are not necessarily in need of it. These boats are designed to be extremely user friendly. As near shore (ramp or launch site) paddlers, they have the greatest interaction with powerboaters. Often less than amiable exchanges take place, especially after a long day of powerboating and the consumption of alcohol which quite often accompanies it. On the Dave K subject of human waste disposal, "PACK IT IN, PACK IT OUT," seems to me to be the ONLY solution. The problem is voluntary compliance and enforcement. How about this, anyone who litters (feces or other trash) is made to pick up litter (feces or other trash). People need to be educated as to the proper and expected behaviors and then held accountable. This would be easy in a watertrail situation as people could be educated prior to securing a permit and provided with a sanitary disposal site at the end of the trip. On the subject of permitting. No block permits. I resent it tremendously when I can't get three permits for an overnight trip because a large outfitter blocked out twenty spots six months earlier on the speculation that he could sell the positions. These are public lands, I was under the impression that equal access was guaranteed under the law. I believe that the most difficult issue in this discussion is carrying capacities. How much traffic can a natural area tolerate without suffering significant degradation (physical, visual, spiritual, commercial). IMHO the impacts of man on a natural area may not be immediately recognizable. Ex. if you frighten roosting birds in a rookery, you may have a significant decline in hatchlings or the adults may not return to the site next season. The extent of the impact may not be seen for years. EDUCATION. Education needs to be more than proper strokes and strobe lights. It needs to be Environmental Ethic taught at the elementary school level. And it does not need to be confused with or connected to religion. That my friends is the ONLY way that we can ensure "paddling" areas for future generations. LET IT RIP ALL YOU WHO BELIEVE WE SHOULD ALL ACCEPT OUR INEVITABLE FATE BY EITHER GROWING UP or DEALING WITH IT or GETTING A LIFE or FURTHER IGNORING IT Thanx, Bruce Whole Earth Outfitters *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Sep 26 1999 - 06:27:44 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:13 PDT