Re: [Paddlewise] Saturation Point

From: <BijiliE_at_aol.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:22:16 EDT
In a message dated 9/27/99 10:01:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
baker_at_montana.com writes:

<< Hmmm...it strikes me there's something in that.  (Making public 100 yds.
 back from beaches--not the revolution.)  Of course, almost all the land
 in question is privately owned, so it would take a revolution.  Too bad
 it wasn't set up that way when the land was deeded.  There are lakes
 here in Montana that have all public beaches--it's like a big public
 Boulevard--pretty nice, IMHO. >>

Yes, we are really lucky here in Sacramento that wise people set aside much 
of the banks of our Lower American River (which runs through the city) for 
parks. There are a few private homes up on the bluffs, but the banks are 
accessible throughout. We also have some beautiful parks on the two lakes 
above the Lower American (Folsom Lake and Lake Natoma). We weren't so lucky 
with the South Fork American, most of which is private land and posted as a 
quiet area. This necessity of being quiet during an exciting whitewater raft 
trip does detract somewhat from the experience.

BijiliE 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Mon Sep 27 1999 - 11:23:22 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:14 PDT