PaddleWise by thread

From: Robert Woodard <woodardr_at_tidalwave.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 20:06:55 -0400
The recreational boating accident statistics for 1997 have recently been
posted on the U.S. Coast Guard web site for anyone interested (Aug 1999)

http://www.uscgboating.org/stats.html

Woody


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: BaysideBob <vaughan_at_jps.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 17:48:09 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Woodard <woodardr_at_tidalwave.net>
To: Paddlewise <paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net>; CPAKayaker
<cpakayaker_at_lists.shire.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 5:06 PM
Subject: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics


> The recreational boating accident statistics for 1997 have recently been
> posted on the U.S. Coast Guard web site for anyone interested (Aug 1999)
>
> http://www.uscgboating.org/stats.html
>
> Woody

OK, I downloaded the document and intend to wade through it.

There are "accidents" and there is "risk-management".

I went to Viet Nam in 1966 and came back with all my fingers and toes
(soured me on "camping",  your secret secluded places are safe from me).

I've been a Deputy Sheriff for 26 years and have never (touch wood) been
seriously injured at work.

I'm very, very cautious and a boring paddle-partner who would rather back
off and find another way.

Bob


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Robert Woodard <woodardr_at_tidalwave.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 20:25:07 -0400
> OK, I downloaded the document and intend to wade through it.
>
> There are "accidents" and there is "risk-management".

Some interesting (though selected) info:

110 kayak/canoe deaths in 1997 (13.4% of all reported boating fatalities)
96 drowned, 14 *other*

While there are fewer accidents in the colder months, your chances of dying
if involved in an accident in Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, Mar, and April is
much higher than in the warmer months.

There were 79 reported injuries in a canoe/kayak in 1997:
45 (56%) of the injuries were related to hypOthermia

There were 171 canoe/kayak *accidents* in 1997:
123 were related to capsizing (72% of canoe/kayak accidents)
4 flooding
13 collision with another vessel
8 collision with a fixed object
1 collision with a floating object
1 collision with a submerged object
1 skier mishap
13 falls overboard (canoe?)
7 other


So, worded another way:

In 1997, canoe/kayak deaths accounted for a little more than one in every
ten boating related deaths. As a group, we (the canoe/kayak operators) have
more than our fair share. Not all states require numbering of canoes/kayaks,
but there were a little over 12 million OTHER types of boats that were
registered. I'll leave it up to the reader to guess what a small pecentage
that canoes/kayaks make up of the total boats. Even PWC operators had less
deaths than canoe/kayak operators (but a much higher injury rate).

Hypothermia - Any questions?

Capsizing accidents - Think it might contribute to the hypothermia stats?
Learn how to get back in, or stay in to start with.

Woody


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: R. Walker <rww_at_mailbox.neosoft.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 20:47:54 -0500
> 110 kayak/canoe deaths in 1997 (13.4% of all reported boating fatalities)
> 96 drowned, 14 *other*
> 
> While there are fewer accidents in the colder months, your chances of
> dying if involved in an accident in Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb, Mar, and
> April is much higher than in the warmer months.
> 
> There were 79 reported injuries in a canoe/kayak in 1997:
> 45 (56%) of the injuries were related to hypOthermia
> 
> There were 171 canoe/kayak *accidents* in 1997:
> 123 were related to capsizing (72% of canoe/kayak accidents)

What would really be telling would be an analysis to show what percentage 
of the accidents were in rented kayaks, and what percentage were in 
owner operated vessels.

Most of the ones I've HEARD about have been folks renting a kayak for a 
day, going out, and doing something that they are no where near ready to 
try.   I still recall the recent Galveston accident where a guy with a rented 
boat, paddle, and a bottle of water launches off the beach, and heads 
offshore like its the safest thing in the world.  Of course he died by 
drowning after being seperated from his boat.



Richard Walker
Houston, TX
http://www.neosoft.com/~rww/kayak_log.html
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Robert Woodard <woodardr_at_tidalwave.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:06:51 -0400
> Most of the ones I've HEARD about have been folks renting a kayak for a
> day, going out, and doing something that they are no where near ready to
> try.   I still recall the recent Galveston accident where a guy
> with a rented
> boat, paddle, and a bottle of water launches off the beach, and heads
> offshore like its the safest thing in the world.  Of course he died by
> drowning after being seperated from his boat.

I too have wondered. I'd really like to know how many were canoe and how
many were kayak. Even further - how many of the kayaks were white water
kayak deaths? Recreational/Touring/Sea kayaks?

I can't help but think the number of kayak deaths each year is very low, or
we'd hear more about it in this forum. I suspect there are many more canoes
on the water than kayaks. But it's pure speculation for me to try and break
it down any further than what is reported in the report.

Woody


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: BaysideBob <vaughan_at_jps.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 19:52:13 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Woodard <woodardr_at_tidalwave.net>
To: BaysideBob <vaughan_at_jps.net>; Paddlewise
<paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net>; CPAKayaker <cpakayaker_at_lists.shire.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 5:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics


> > OK, I downloaded the document and intend to wade through it.

Wading through it.

Canoe/kayak are simply that.  Not broken down to rivers/open water.
I think that is a big deal.  Rec boats paddle newsgroup is replete with
references to river deaths.  Anecdotal, not statistical of course.

I suspect there is a much greater statistical risk in whitewater than sea
kayaking but the data from USCG doesn't break it down.  Given the long
threads
on signaling devices, etc. I believe the sea-kayaking community is a bit
more aware of their fragile mortality than other boaters.  I remember
neglecting to check the tide table and sitting on an island beach for hours
waiting for it to turn.  My conclusion was: "A human has only a limited
amount of control on this sea- thing".  But that's what's so attractive.
Placing
yourself in a boat you can lift over your head and entering a world of wind,
tide and
current that you can't control, you can only work with, not against.  It
doesn't matter how important you are in the rest of the world, how clever
you are
or how strong you are.  You're in a totally overpowering world of elements
and I glance to my left and see some two pound bird comfortably floating in
the water looking at me like "what's your problem?"  Sometimes the tide
flows out the Goden Gate at over five knots.  If you didn't check the table
before you put in, I hope you can reach your lunch from the cockpit.  In the
"real world" I'm a burned-out cop.  I suspect most sea-kayakers would be
pretty good beat-partners.  Not gregarious or even agreeable perhaps, but
certainly reliable.  Reliable partners is what keeps you alive in a world of
risk.




***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Joe Pylka <pylka_at_castle.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:42:12 -0400
> I suspect there are many more canoes
>on the water than kayaks. But it's pure speculation for me to try and break
>it down any further than what is reported in the report.

        I'm not at all sure of that here in Central NJ.  Many of the outdoor
stores here no longer carry canoes, only kayaks, and mostly the recreational
type.  The Perception Swifty is a really big seller.  It's cheap and cute
(!).
        I've also talked with many such paddlers and they view their boats
as just another gym machine.  That really scares me.  They can go forward
but the Concept of a draw or a brace is completely unknown to them.  Nor are
they aware that there are paddling clubs, organized instruction, etc.  That,
too, scares me.

>***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <BijiliE_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 01:01:27 EDT
Woody said: << I can't help but think the number of kayak deaths each year is 
very low, or we'd hear more about it in this forum. I suspect there are many 
more canoes on the water than kayaks. But it's pure speculation for me to try 
and break
 it down any further than what is reported in the report.  >>

Well, the number of sea kayaking deaths may be low, but if you spend some 
time reading RBP you will have noticed that the number of WW kayaking deaths 
seems much higher.

BijiliE
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <dmccarty_at_us.ibm.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 11:10:17 -0400
|Woody said: << I can't help but think the number of kayak deaths each year is
|very low, or we'd hear more about it in this forum. I suspect there are many
|more canoes on the water than kayaks. But it's pure speculation for me to try
|and break  it down any further than what is reported in the report.  >>

|Well, the number of sea kayaking deaths may be low, but if you spend some
|time reading RBP you will have noticed that the number of WW kayaking deaths
|seems much higher.

This was exactly my comment/thought when I saw the earlier posts on this
subject.  I have not read r.b.p. in months but in the years I did keep up with
the newsgroup it seemed that there was a death every couple of months and many
very close calls.   To many close calls and deaths.   Some of the close call
stories sent chills up my back.  The last death on r.b.p was of a regular poster
on the newsgroup.  He was killed running a river and a spot he had run many
times before.  It was well within his skill level.

BaysideBob said...
"Given the long threads on signaling devices, etc. I believe the sea-kayaking
community is a bit more aware of their fragile mortality than other boaters."

Most of the whitewater people are VERY safety concious.  VERY.  The WW people on
r.b.p. are just as safety concious as the people on this list.  The problem I
see in whitewater is that a slight change in "things"can be deadly when the
chain of events are just right.  One of the last close calls I read was a story
where the water level had dropped just a bit.  Less water should be good right?
Not always.  The guy had one of these WW kayaks where the stern is long and very
thin.  He went through the rapid and the stern of his boat got caught in an
undercut in the rock.  The water pressure then pushed him and the boat
underwater.  He barely got out alive.  Of course his version of the event is
much more discriptive than mine!  If the water level had been up another inch or
two or if he had a high volume stern the accident would not have happened....

>From reading the accident reports on r.b.p it seemed that there were two type of
accidents.  Many, maybe most of the deaths, were people running rivers
completely above their skill level.  Ignorance and Arrogance was a big factor in
these accidents.  But the deaths that scared me the most were the people dying
doing what was within their skill set.  Running rivers they had run many times
and the same water levels.  The would run a river they knew really well and it
would kill them.  Simple as that.  The accidents described in r.b.p. just seemed
to be Act O God type of things.  Course one could argue that running a raging
river in a little boat ain't sane but given the skills, knowledge, conditions,
etc. these people seemingly died by random events.

I don't see this randomness in sea kayaking accidents.  Lots of ignorance caused
accidents but not many random events.  Can anyone relate a touring kayaking
accident that was random?

My impression is that at the higher rapid levels IV+ the chance of random death
is very high in white water.  I define "very high" as I ain't going there!  Or
on a III rapid either.  8-)

It would be interesting if the accidents could be broken down by boat type and
environmental conditions.

Later...
Dan McCarty


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <BijiliE_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 11:58:09 EDT
In a message dated 10/1/99 8:19:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
dmccarty_at_us.ibm.com writes:

<< My impression is that at the higher rapid levels IV+ the chance of random 
death
 is very high in white water.  I define "very high" as I ain't going there!  
Or
 on a III rapid either.  8-)  >>

Me either. Class II in a kayak or open canoe is fine with me. Flatwater is 
wonderful too! 

BijiliE
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 12:34:09 -0700
BijiliE_at_aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 10/1/99 8:19:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> dmccarty_at_us.ibm.com writes:
> 
> << My impression is that at the higher rapid levels IV+ the chance of random
> death
>  is very high in white water.  I define "very high" as I ain't going there!
> Or
>  on a III rapid either.  8-)  >>

>From my reading of various mags and that newsgroup, the deaths in WW
tend to happen at both ends, i.e. beginners in Class I-II stuff and real
expert paddlers in Class IV-VI.

The first kind are people falling out of rafts or just totally inept or
ill equipped with no technique developed yet.  The second kind is just
the luck and the greater challenge the experts are setting for
themselves.  If they miss a certain line on the river, or fail to eddy
out before some dangerous spot, or the hydralics have changes a bit or
new log strainers have positioned themselves on the river, ALL or ANY of
that can do in the expert.

I think it was either last year or the year before when about a half
dozen top-flight paddlers got killed in WW episodes and it was written
up in various magazines.  The paddling pedigree of these guys was
outstanding but just a split second timing failure did them in.

I think that in seakayaking you are not (knock on wood) seeing the
top-flight paddlers getting hurt or killed.  You are seeing however the
beginners or the completely uninitiated getting hurt or killed. 
Incidents like some painter or repairman at a Northeast seashore
vacation home in March grabbing a kayak that has been sitting around in
a shed and taking it for a quick paddle sans PFD, skill, cold water
gear, etc. and flipping the boat and drowning or dying from cold water
exposure.  Or some moderately skilled paddlers on a multi-day trip
pushing their luck by going out in rougher water to make some sort of
timetable rather than just camping out a few more days until conditions
improved.  That woman who died in Greenland last year was in that
category although other things were involved too, which have already
been discussed on PaddleWise.

For the most part, seakayaking is not thrills driven or challenge
focused in terms of risk taking.  Most of the paddling isn't of that
nature.  And for the challenging stuff, the paddlers in question are
generally prepared such as the Tsunami Rangers in their surfing rock
gardens, etc.

Still there is so much of it and with lots of people unawares taking it
up.  The other day, as night began to descend,  I saw a couple in a
Sevylor Tahiti using an umbrella to get some wind as they left Pier 25
(just south of the Boathouse).  They were gorgeous looking individuals,
and the light-skinned Afican-American in the front seat looked like a
model whose face plasters the fashion pages.  There was just one paddle
and the umbrella.  It was getting dark and they did not have lights nor
PFDs.  As they went out the current caught them and they drifted down
toward the busy run of ferries going in and out of North Cove.  They
were oblivious to the danger to themselves.

Meanwhile I was fretting for my own little serendipitiously put together
group, three kayaks.  One person not too experienced.  We were all PFDed
but I had just two lights with me and I was being very cautious in our
paddling plans, i.e. no intention to go out across the river nor toward
the busy ferry lane and trying to figure out what to do with just two
lights. (I finally settled on keeping one unlit kayak between the two
with lights and hugging the pierheads and only going a half mile or so. 
I did a lot of head swiveling all that time.).

I assume the uninformed beautiful people in the Sevylor got back safely
but not because of any smarts, just sheer luck.  It is going to run out
at some point for them and any of us.

ralph diaz 
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <dmccarty_at_us.ibm.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:14:05 -0400
In a message dated 10/1/99 8:19:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
dmccarty_at_us.ibm.com writes:

<< My impression is that at the higher rapid levels IV+ the chance of random
death
 is very high in white water.  I define "very high" as I ain't going there!
Or
 on a III rapid either.  8-)  >>

|Me either. Class II in a kayak or open canoe is fine with me. Flatwater is
|wonderful too!

|BijiliE

After sending the note I wish I had used "unforseen danger/death/problems" or
some such instead of random.  I did not like random but it twas the best I could
come up with at the time.  Coffee had not hit yet!  8-)

I'm sure I've been on ClassII water a few times in my canoe and it was really
fun.  I've been on some flatwater that was moving very rapidly that could have
been very dangerous with the right conditions.  I was to ignorant to realize it
then but I do now.  And only because I learned quite a bit form the r.b.p
newsgroup.

Later...
Dan McCarty



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <BijiliE_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 1997 boating accident statistics
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:34:04 EDT
In a message dated 10/1/99 9:19:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
dmccarty_at_us.ibm.com writes:

<< I'm sure I've been on Class II water a few times in my canoe and it was 
really
 fun.  I've been on some flatwater that was moving very rapidly that could 
have
 been very dangerous with the right conditions.  I was to ignorant to realize 
it
 then but I do now.  And only because I learned quite a bit form the r.b.p
 newsgroup. >>

Yes, I believe one has to be careful and aware of danger/safety issues on any 
type of water. And I've learned quite a bit from RBP as well. Although I've 
probably learned even more from Paddlewise. Thank you, everyone, for all the 
wonderful information you've shared with this list.

BijiliE
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:03 PDT