The drop down skeg VS rudder discussion provides a pleasant change form the usual rudder VS no rudder debate and gives me the opportunity to serve up some more pedantry. :-) First, drop down skegs and rudders "do" the same thing, I.E. they alter the turning moments about the Center of Gravity. Both can provide lift due to an angle of attack with the water flow. You can get a more complete discussion of these turning moments at http://home.ican.net/~735769/control.htm Often we tend to think of directional stability in terms of the center of lateral area and, while valid for hulls and control surfaces that generate little or no lift it doesn't really apply well to lifting surfaces. Sailboat designers learned that early on when they shifted from long keels to high lift keels and their "rule of thumb" methods for finding the center of lateral resistance no longer worked so well. Rudders increase the effect by allowing an even greater angle of attack and, if the rudder has a suitable section shape, it can provide significant increases in lift. The two differ in degree of effect and in the ability of one to allow a wider range of effect over the other. The skeg varies the turning moments through adjusting the exposed area and the rudder (most often) adjusts it by altering the angle of attack. In anticipation of some one raising the resistance issue, it seems that rudders more resistance per unit area due to surface piercing effects or, in the case of under hull rudders, due to cross over effects between the hull and rudder but that does not mean that the net effort to paddle the boat increases. As I have pointed out before, if the designer plans on using a rudder or skeg he can design the boat with significantly less surface area that, when coupled with any reductions in leeway and reductions in resistance due to heel should offset the added resistance of the rudder. Unfortunately most people look at rudders and skegs as "additive" only as in "If we add a rudder to XYZ boat it will have more resistance" rather than "if we design boat ABC for a rudder or a skeg it will have less". Individually one has to decide whether one sees operating a rudder with the feet over a skeg with the hands as an advantage. One can easily set up the skeg to operate with the feet so I don't see any inherent advantage in one over the other in operation. I personally have no problem with deck mounted controls but that has to do with my style of paddling. I kind of enjoy steering with the paddle and heel but then I come from a canoe background. An interesting aspect of skegs comes from their location. Both skegs and rudders generate lift to offset leeway. A skeg mounted well forward would work in much the same way as a centerboard on a sail boat producing a net increase in efficiency when paddling in conditions that produce leeway. A rather neat aspect deriving (possibly) from a more amidships location comes in the form of both reducing leeway and weathercocking that, depending upon the shape of the hull, may not inhibit maneuverability. Alex makes a good point when he blames builders for mushy foot pegs. I would place the blame for include almost every ill attributed to rudders (Ditto for skegs) squarely on the backs of builders. Floppy, flat plate rudders with improperly swaged fittings and nylon straps for length adjustment etc. will make a person weep. Many of the ills ascribed to rudders have nothing to do with rudders and a lot to do with builders. I have seen swages crimped with pliers, no thimbles, wires bearing on the threads of bolts, stretchy nylon adjustment straps, foot pegs that slide right of the tracks, Etc. Etc. If we had built sailboats that way we would have lots more room at marinas and overcrowding in cemeteries. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Oct 18 1999 - 06:12:35 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:15 PDT