Re: [Paddlewise] Yakima roundbar slippage/new rack

From: <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:10:55 -0700
Reeves, Debbie (Debbie) wrote:
> 
> I'm with Dave on this one.  I purchased mine 12/98.  How wonderful of the
> company to recommend that we consumers fix their product.  By the way, by
> stripping off the plastic coating, several people in our group have had
> their bars rust.
> 
> Debbie Reeves

I often have wondered why people, when faced with round vs. square,
continue to get the round ones, i.e. Yakimas as opposed to Thules.  The
square bars can't roll and they also seem to tighten better inside the
towers, at least from my own experience and observation of others.

(Also, a square bar is stronger than a round one, I believe, of the same
dimensions and wall thickness.  At least that is true when comparing
round vs. square stringers in folding kayaks.  Arguably the toughest
frames are of the latter type, i.e. boats like the Feathercraft Short
Touring and their K-2 which have square long tubes as opposed to the
round ones of their other models.)

>From what I have seen of the roof rack bars, both Thule and Yakima
pretty much match up in price, offer similar specialized accessories and
an array of kits for fitting to different cars.  The only difference
that I detected early on, and this may have changed, is that the kayak
saddles on the Thules were harder to change width adjustments on than
with the Yakima ones.  I once was renting and borrowing hardshells as
well as putting assembled foldables of various models on my Thule rack
and using the saddles.  The adjustments to accomodate different widths
of boats were a pain in the butt; the Yakima saddles looked easier. 
Perhaps this has changed for the Thule ones.  My solution was to retire
the saddles (I eventually sent them gratis to Jack Martin last year when
he was looking to buy a pair; perhaps that is why he doesn't pick on me
:-)) and I switched over to the windsurfer type pads that fit on Thule
or Yakima bars and this eliminated any need for adjustment for different
widths.

My experience with these pads and their doing no damage to any boat is
part of my reason for confidence in the portable roof pad setup I am
using now with rental cars.  If anything, those pads are even better
than the windsurfer ones in that they have a bit of shape to them and
will support more of a kayak's curved surface.  Their are two widths. 
The smaller one looks idea for kayaks with sharper V hulls; the wider
one for more rounded bottoms or wider kayaks such as doubles and
foldable singles.  The wider one also has a wider opening at the bottom
which looks like will fit easily around factory roof racks and so could
be used with them...we did discuss this last week I think.

ralph diaz
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Oct 26 1999 - 07:12:35 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:15 PDT