> From: Joan Spinner <JSpinner_at_agu.org> <snip> > The longer this thread runs the more confused I am. I am gaining > no clarity on the issue thought I am seeing a lot of opinions. It could > be I'm making this issue more complicated than it is but it looks REAL > complicated from my computer. I've read the SK article on risk assessment > and all the postings here. I still don't get why some of you are so harsh in > you evaluation. It may be justified but so far I have not heard a logical > argument for saying, "This guy was way over the edge for normal. " > In real simple, short thoughts, can someone explain this to me, please? I'm somewhat confused, also. I thought the discussion involved two different incidents. For those that want to read the newspaper report again, it has been moved to http://www.portland.com/frnews/kayak1105.shtml He did take a lot of precautions where a lot of folks do not that could possibly have saved his life (the float plan, pfd, and wearing a wetsuit for cold water conditions spring to mind). Also, I'm not clear on how rough the seas were in which he first started out. There was mention of 6 to 8 foot seas but I assumed that to mean swells which are not difficult to paddle (though lots of fun :-) I suspect conditions worsened for which he was not prepared, but I'm not sure I would describe him as a loose cannon. Just my .02 Cheers, Jackie *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Nov 11 1999 - 11:46:18 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:16 PDT