RE: [Paddlewise] Polartec Thermal Stretch, Is it good or what is better?

From: Robert Woodard <woodardr_at_tidalwave.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 21:42:10 -0500
>I just
> noticed this Polartec Thermal Stretch...How does it compare to a wet suit?

Hi Michael,

I own a Polartec farmer john and paddling jacket. They work real well down
till about 55 degree water. I can't vouch for any lower as I switched to a
dry suit with the water hovering at about 55. They are about the equivalent
of 2 - 2.5 mil neoprene. When it first flushes with water, I think the
Polartec is MUCH colder than my 3 mil wet suit. The reason I think is that
the fuzzy stuff lets in more (thicker layer) water initially. But once that
water warms it seems 'almost' as warm as my 3mm wetsuit.

If I had it to do over, I think I would get the 'fuzzy rubber' version. This
is just like the Polartec, but has a rubber skin on the out side. The reason
is the Polartec, once wet and in the wind, does suffer from some evaporative
cooling loss. I think the rubber outer shell would help eliminate this. (I
think Rapid Style sells this)

The big upside is comfort - When dry it is 100% more comfortable than
neoprene! I wear my thermal stretch under my dry suit as an inner layer and
protection in case of a leak. I recommend the stuff and would have never
bought my neoprene if I had found this first. Might want to get others
advice on the lower temperature range though.

Hope this helps,

Woody



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Mon Nov 29 1999 - 18:45:53 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:17 PDT