Re: [Paddlewise] durability (was Romeny)

From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_home.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 13:54:43 -0500
BaysideBob wrote:

> I'd also appreciate opinions on this one.  My instinct is "more expensive is
> better" but I'm not so sure.  I have about half the money saved up for the
> next (unchosen) boat.  I'm getting hammered with overtime at work so the
> money difference matters little.  The how long will it last does.  Light
> weight is good.  Longer lasting is better (for this boat).  I have a kevlar
> boat and a carbon/kevlar boat.  I'm able to baby them both.  The next one I
> intend to beat the crap out of and expect it to last a lifetime (I'm
> figuring 15-20 years God willing).  What should I be looking for regarding
> layup?

My only comment is that heavy isn't necessarily stronger.  If the builder
doesn't use vacuum bagging, they may have more epoxy in the boat than
they need without a significant increase in strength.

Some manufacturers offer expedition versions of their kayaks.  Current
Designs, as one example, will lay up a kevlar version of a hull that weighs
about the same as a fiberglass version.  They've added extra kevlar for
strength and that's where the weight comes from.  Note that the deck isn't
made stronger - only the hull.

Mike

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Jan 04 2000 - 10:55:07 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:18 PDT