Hi everyone. Never thought I'd be the subject of this much discussion, nor the subject in the subject header! My e-mail was down for a couple of days, so I was a little embarrassed to open up the two digest versions of PW and see so much talk. Thanks for the support though! On one post, Jed said (where would we be without Jed?!): >> Hopefully this will be my last entry into the Doug Lloyd Defense Thread. I am saddened to hear that you were raked over the "back channel" coals by someone trying to protect the newbies.>> I was raked over the coals nicely. The unnamed back-channeler carefully and intelligently laid out their concerns. I simply wanted to put my apology into context. Interestingly, there was nothing that was said in that private e-mail to me that was not something I wasn't already thinking about. >> I (we) don't need that kind of protection. We need knowledge, not to have our ignorance fertilized. I take heart in the postings from newbies that find themselves, as I do, experiencing and learning vicariously through some of your hairier postings. For me your escapades help solidify my own self-defined limits by reinforcing that danger lies beyond. I don't want to experience the ragged edge, I believe that I might not survive it.>> I will not stop posting. In my original post I did say "And if you want me to continue to be part of Paddlewise, you will just have to put up with me and some of my ramblings and dangerous paddle-play antics, because that is part of who I am." Those dangerous paddle-play antics yet to be posted from my log, are mostly "history" - things from my past that I feel good lessons have come out of. I will retrojet into them, some current thought as well. I would always, and usually do, add caveats. >>To change or restrict your language would gut the content of it.>> PW is the only place I can relate events without the censure of heavy-handed editors. But I do need to be careful with my "wordology", so that a novice might not misinterpret posts. Also, I would assume that where I had mentioned a lesson learned, it would be taken in the context of the time frame of my own advancement through the sport, which depending on the date of the occurrence, would indicate to the reader who the intended audience was - though a novice will quickly, and usually, recognize "why" things went wrong. I am a fairly safe person. I run hands-on router seminars with novices as a part-time pursuit, doing fairly advanced pattern routing and tenons within a short period of time with them. I also have taught beginners woodworking for 16 years to adults. These are large, in-depth courses. I am know for my safety record and emphasis on safety basics and back-ups. I get little remuneration, but I thrill to see middle-aged moms, for example, whose husbands have run out on them, discover the joy and independence of creating custom made furniture - and doing it with safety. In woodworking, there are norms for safety practices that are non-negotiable. Although there are ascending levels of danger (like shaper table work), by and large, you don't progress to riskier and riskier activities. You just take on more complex projects, or bigger ones. Sea kayaking and WW activities are different. Often paddlers want to ascend to newer levels of risk, or at least where greater risk is inherent, be it a Class Two to a Class Three, taking on an exposed, high-latitude coastline. This is why I do well with woodworking novices, but refrain from teaching/rubbing shoulders much with paddler-novices. I've stated that up front, but it is difficult in a mixed audience environment like paddlewise. >>Please Uncle Doug, tell us another scary bedtime story. We'll grow up believing in monsters that live in tide races and storm winds (and vacuum-bagged boats), and we will stay away from them, and teach our children to stay away from them. And when our children ask why some battering rams are shaped like kayaks, well . . we'll just smile and stare off into space. Jed>> Well, Jed is in character as usual. But it is worth mentioning that while monsters _don't_ live in tide races and storm winds, any paddler can make _monstrous mistakes_ and get into serious difficulty. Jed knows this, as do we all, but those monstrous mistakes start out innocently enough. Many of my "escapades" started out innocently enough too: checking the marine weather forecast, but not the land-based civilian one for comparison and/or confirmation; pouring over charts and manuals ad nauseum and then leaving out one tiny information source that would have profoundly influenced a decision to paddle in a particular location; setting out with a narrow window of opportunity, and not leaving enough room for a margins for unknown factors; putting too much faith in another paddlers assertions over their own skills and experience, and finding out too late it was all "talk"; and forgetting about that side-drift while religiously following your bearing on the compass - too name a few. Those types of occurrences happen to paddlers all too often. It behooves me to share those experiences on this forum whether the context is or is not one of seeking adventure - after all, "questionable conditions" ia a relative term .In reality, the times when I head out into the middle-distance in a big gale and get into trouble are rare, but I will not censure those either - just not glorify it all. BTW, I headed out this Sunday afternoon to paddle a 40 knot westerly, but the system stalled, and the revised forecast went to 55 knots off headlands SE. My back was soar from carrying a huge router table down the stairs on Saturday, and the upper back muscles are still recovering from an eccentricity invoked during the Storm Island tow - so I went to the gym for stretching, light reps, and some isometric excersises with an elastic tube, instead. See, there is hope for me yet. But the words of Matt Broze still ring true to me all these years later after reading his comments in the book "Deep Trouble" about paddlers who take on grand adventures retaining some sobriety when they are around novices. In closing: To all the regular PW'er heavy-hitters who are rolling their eyes over all this Doug Lloyd nonsense of late, I apologize to you too. However, the troops have indicated that discussion is always good (if maybe a little tedious). I know I always come away from Paddlewise with a quantum improvement in my understanding of how others think and view various topics. I've even had the odd cyber-epiphany. BC'in Ya Doug Who! (Plase note new e-mail address) *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Jan 16 2000 - 22:30:00 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:18 PDT