Power is exponential so 100 watts will only make a couple of units difference over 10 watts, 1 watt difference would hardly be measurable and could be more then compensated for in the antenna -----Original Message----- From: owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net [mailto:owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net]On Behalf Of ralph diaz Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 12:54 PM To: Doug Lloyd Cc: PaddleWise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF Radio Doug Lloyd wrote: > > I know VHF's have been talked about over and over on this list, but I have > a very specific question. I may be able to get a good deal on a waterproof > Standard HX350S, and I was wondering if it is a good radio. As you know, you certainly have come to the right place in terms of getting some good discussion. The Standard HX350S is one of the top radio choices for the many reasons elaborated on in PaddleWise a little over a year ago. The other good choice would be the Raytheon 102 which replaces the Apelco 520. The Raytheon 102 does not pack the power capacity of the Standard (which is 1100 whatchamacallits compared to the Raytheon's 600) but can be remedied by the larger available battery pack from the company's Raytheon 106 that brings it up to 1200 capacity. In fact, thinking out loud and considering where you paddle in more isolated areas or away from things, the Raytheon 106 might be a better choice yet. It broadcasts at 6 watts whereas the top strength of the other marine radios is at 5 watts. Perhaps that 1 watt may make a difference between a perceptible signal and a non-signal, 15 percent or so difference is 15 percent or so difference. I personally like the Standard for my specific use. It has a huge display screen and what's more the items display on the whole screen and not a small part of it as you see in other models that have the same amount of "glass" (or pyrex or whatever the view screen cover is). It does seem like a mini-TV. I am too vain to wear bifocals and the big display suits that vanity. I like that its default is to 1 watt rather than 5 watt as is the Raytheon's default since I am in harbors and close in waters where 1 watt should be enough and saves battery life. The Standard also has several more programmable buttons so just hitting a button gets you calling on a selected channel. And, when you turn it on and off, it starts up with whatever channel you were on last as opposed to going to 16 which is what the Raytheon does. These are small things that may be important to some individuals and not others. Again, I would however suggest you give serious consideration to that one additional watt in power that you can get from the Raytheon 106, which also comes with the bigger 1200 battery. It is also a smallish radio. What with all the gear and gold bullion you carry from your deceased aunt's estate, the lower weight and size of the Raytheon may make a difference to you :-) ralph ralph -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024 Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com "Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Feb 03 2000 - 10:08:39 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:19 PDT