At 07:44 PM 2/19/00 -0800, you wrote: >Doug wrote: >>Don't forget to add that sculling brace >>though...can be mighty important in preventing a full knock-over. >> > >I practice my sculling brace on every outing and am fairly confident in it. >But I have never used it for real. A quick low or high brace has always >been adequate. In surf, of course, I am on a brace longer when broached. > >Any examples of how you actually used your sculling brace. Did it require >more than one or two sculls before recovery? > >Jerry I think we had a go 'round on this topic a while back. I can't remember the concurrences and/or conclusions, but I do remember those with skinny kayaks were more apt to practice sculling and actually employ its use (apologies to John Winters for invoking the ill-defined and meaningless "skinny boat" term). With my Nordkapp at 21 inches and a round hull, secondary stability is somewhat dependent upon the user's paddle-play savvy. There is a point where you know you just don't have the time or right angle to throw that needed brace. At times like that, I don't even try; I just commit over to a sculling brace which renders immediate stability in most situations. Typically, once stability is encountered, I'll either high brace back up by bringing the scull to center right angle or simply scull powerfully so I am vertical again. There are variations. I use sculling for surprise "knock-overs", poor eddyline crossing mistakes, or at times, when things are just too narley and things go "sideways". When I do my west coast trips with two of my buddies (one's a professor, one's a school teacher), we three amigos will be seen at the beginning and end of each paddling day, dunking our heads into the water and sculling back up, so as to stay "tuned-in". We also paddle close in-shore, amongst the boomers, so need to stay "tuned-in". The only time my sculling got me _into_ trouble was during the onset of my trial Island incident. I had too much faith in my sculling ability, held on too long such that my sinuses flooded with water. There is a point where one should simply go over, set up to windward, and roll back up in the braced position. Interestingly, whitewater paddlers don't use sculling much. They also have 24 inch or wider kayaks. I don't expect the folks on this list who behave themselves to understand some of these topics we cover on Paddlewise. They simply can't relate, and so they shouldn't have to. What I find difficult to understand is those on this list who do get out into some more difficult conditions, usually pull-back before the going gets really rough (which is good on them), yet give others a hard time and call the need to use some of these skills like sculling and rolling as a sign of some kind of failure. Pull back from challenging conditions, yes; but pull back from your derogatory remarks about those who enjoy the other end of the spectrum. If you want to remain inextensible, that's fine. But those who like a little peradventure in their lives should remain free to pursue more esoteric skills. Er, what was the question again, Jerry? BC'in Ya Doug Lloyd *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Feb 21 2000 - 23:02:20 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:20 PDT