Re: [Paddlewise] Now I'm curious: how dangerous _is_ kayaking?

From: Stephen Bird <stephen.bird_at_superaje.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 10:54:56 -0500
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000 09:41:52 -0500 (EST), you wrote:

>>Waivers are virtually useless.  Win or lose a lawsuit can put a small 
>>operator out of business.

I wonder how many operators have or can afford liability insurance?

>Based on the outcome of the most recent (actually, the only) WW rafting
>death on the Nantahala, having a waiver may or may not help you,

I just did a quick search of North Carolina cases using "Nantahala" but
found no reports of this WW rafting mishap. It may be that it was settled
without a trial/reported decision which, to add to Dave's earlier posting,
is not the best way to know or report on paddling accidents vs climbing
accidents reported by the AAC.

>... but NOT having one is the kiss of death if there is an accident.
>In that incident, a girl on a school rafting trip fell out of a raft,
>was foot-entrapped, and drowned.

There are lots and lots of school cases with problems with both equipment
(eg, gymnastic mats) and supervision (eg, a school outing along a river).

>From the reports I read, it seems likely that she was wearing her PFD
>too loose and that she attempted to stand in the current. She certainly
>had received the pre-trip safety instruction.

Good that she had the pre-trip safety instruction, but poor that the guide
and teacher didn't notice how she was wearing her PFD. I imagine that both
guide and teacher were somewhat pre-occupied with the river. Probably some
contributory negligence there on the part of the girl. Maybe a "buddy
system" would have been helpful to keep equipment properly worn.

>Of course, no one wants to blame a victim, expecially a 16-y.o. girl. The
>judgment was against the school/teacher and the Nantahala Outdoor Center
>for not having provided the parent an opportunity to give informed consent
>via a waiver. AFAIK, and understand that I am relying on Internet reports,
>there was no allegation or admission of any on-the-water negligence.

Interesting outcome which provides compensation for the parents of the girl
without having to deal with the respective liability of the parties.

Informed consent and the use of waivers is always important. The presence
of signs or forms/tickets excluding liability (at a ski hill, for example)
are not enough if they have not been brought to the attention of the skier.
The difficult part is in balancing informed consent without scaring away
potential customers.
--- 
cheers, Stephen                     stephen.bird_at_superaje.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Sun Feb 27 2000 - 07:56:10 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:20 PDT