PaddleWise by thread

From: ralph diaz <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 08:34:10 -0800
Sometimes in the euphoria surrounding sea kayaking, we tend to forget
that others don't see us in the same romantic, close-to-nature image
that we have of ourselves.  From time to time, incidents and situations
crop up to show that we are not always welcomed with open arms or
curiousity. 

My reading of this tells me that bans on sea kayakers and off-limits
signs are on the increase.  I think these arise for at least three
reasons:

1.  Over exposure or usage.  The incidents and issues in the San Juan
Islands are an example.  Here in the Big Apple area, there is one such
ban for years.  Just a quarter of a mile south of the Downtown
Boathouse, the North Cove basin, which houses a luxury ship marina, has
a sign on its entrance say "No Sea Kayaks, No Jet Skiis."  As in the San
Juan Islands, the number of sea kayakers visiting the places and perhaps
not being too careful in how they do it affects perceptions.

2.  Ignorance.  People get wrong notions about sea kayakers and clamp
down.  Again I know this happened here with one official launch site in
Staten Island that led to interesting paddling to a graveyard of ships. 
The site was near an historic house and required crossing a side lawn. 
That lawn is not off limits to people playing and picnicking.  But the
administrators envisioned armies of sea kayakers dragging their boats
across the lawn (my estimate was that at most there would be perhaps 50
paddlers a year using the site) and they forced the Parks Dept to remove
the site from the launch sites list.

3.  Competing interests.  In this area, some of the commercial
interests, not all, would love to see us entirely prohibited from
paddling in the harbor.  I think it won't happen; the Coast Guard is not
going to go for it (although they did ban jet-skiing in Boston harbor,
from what I understand) and, before that, some clear modus operandi
would be worked out.

4.  Security areas.  It is easy to forget that some places are protected
for security or other reasons.  Here, the vicinity of the Statue of
Liberty is one.  We are not supposed to get closer than x feet.  This is
especially true around the back end or westernmost side where there is a
landable beach of sorts.  I have had park rangers come running over with
hastily shouldered rifles when coming close in that area.  It happened
again last year when I had a group of NYC firemen (who we take out as a
public service for what they do for all of us) and we stopped to hug the
shore there while getting our breathes to deal with a sudden wind storm
and this happened.

I bring this all up just to remind us of perceptions and potential bans,
some of which we can influence with our behavior and others not.  Who
else has seen such incidents or knows of such bans or restrictions?

ralph diaz

   
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <KiAyker_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 10:12:20 EST
In a message dated 2/20/00 5:36:50 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com writes:
 
 <<My reading of this tells me that bans on sea kayakers and off-limits
 signs are on the increase.  I think these arise for at least three
 reasons:
 
 1.  Over exposure or usage.  
 2.  Ignorance.  
 3.  Competing interests.  
 4.  Security areas.>>

   Um, how many reasons did you say there were? Sorry, Ralph, I couldn't 
resist :-)

Scott
So.Cal.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Joe Pylka <pylka_at_castle.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 10:27:57 -0500
>
>3.  Competing interests.  >

>I bring this all up just to remind us of perceptions and potential bans,
>some of which we can influence with our behavior and others not.  Who
>else has seen such incidents or knows of such bans or restrictions?
>ralph diaz
>

        I wish I'd saved it now, but someone sent me a link from a North
Carolina newspaper with a front page story regarding efforts to limit or
exclude sea kayaks (and others) from some of the rivers on the lee side of
the Outer Banks.  Two things happening simultaneously:  greater numbers of
vacation and retirement homes being built on the banks; and a greater number
of kayakers utilising the rivers.
        Homeowners complained, saying that the kayakers were ruining the
tranquility they paid for along THEIR river, etc.  So far as I know, no
ordinances were ever passed regarding this.  This would have been about 1
1/2-2 years ago.
        On another note, Tuckerton NJ is recreating the old Tuckerton
Seaport mainly as a tourist attraction.  In their plans, though, are
creation of canoe/kayak trails in the Great Bay between Long Beach Island
and Brigantine.    About a year ago, a local marina owner (First Bridge
Marina) had become one of the prime renters of jet skis in the area.  He got
rid of them all.  Now he rents touring kayaks, mostly SOTs but others as
well.  This is an area wherein SKing in quiet salt bays could become better
established and accepted.
JP


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: R. Walker <rww_at_mailbox.neosoft.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:58:48 -0600
> My reading of this tells me that bans on sea kayakers and off-limits
> signs are on the increase.  I think these arise for at least three
> reasons:

Fortunately that sort of thing isn't happening here in Texas; then again 
there are no "privately owned" beaches or significant waterways.   We are 
very aggressive about defending our private property rights, but are often 
equally aggressive about excercising our rights on public right of ways.

About the only problems we have about land/water restrictions are for white 
water kayakers; most white water "rivers" in Texas are little more than dry 
creekbeds that become interesting only with significant run off.    But let a 
river be permanent, and even the most rural, isolated public right of way is 
grudgingly respected.  [See various stories about the Devils River in South 
Texas]  However, if you get out of your boat and walk on someone's land 
down there, don't be surprised if the Sheriff shrugs his shoulders as he zips 
your corpse into body bag.  Don't expect the press to be particularly 
agitated either.

> North Cove basin, which houses a luxury ship marina, has a sign on its
> entrance say "No Sea Kayaks, No Jet Skiis."  As in the San Juan 
Islands,

I've seen "no wake" zones with a sheriff sitting in his boat gleafully writing 
tickets as quickly as his fingers can go....    Pretty much, a boat is a boat 
as far as the law is concerned down here.   PS no marina in Texas can 
restrict access to the water it sits on, but considering how easy it is to put 
a kayak in virtually anywhere, on any body of water, and there is little point 
in bugging marinas in the first place.




Richard Walker
Houston, TX
http://www.neosoft.com/~rww/kayak_log.html

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Philip Torrens <skerries_at_hotmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:58:20 PST
>From: ralph diaz <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
>4.  Security areas.  It is easy to forget that some places are protected
>for security or other reasons.  Here, the vicinity of the Statue of
>Liberty is one.  We are not supposed to get closer than x feet.  This is
>especially true around the back end or westernmost side where there is a
>landable beach of sorts.  I have had park rangers come running over with
>hastily shouldered rifles when coming close in that area.

Jeez Ralph,
I know my American cousins are trigger-happy, but what the hell is there on 
Ellis Island that requires the threat of deadly force to defend? Or is this 
one of those deals where if you tell us, you have to kill us? And whatever 
happened to that motto on Lady Liberty "give me your poor... your gasping 
kayakers yearning to take a pee?" (some paraphrasing may have occurred:-)

>Who
>else has seen such incidents or knows of such bans or restrictions?

When I lived in Toronto, I was paddling near the Pickering Nuclear Power 
Plant and I was buzzed good and close by a security boat. At the time, some 
folks were actually questioning the wisdom of generating wastes with lives 
measure in hundreds of thousands of years (and a study has shown that the 
Pickering Plant was being run with a sloppyness that would have appalled 
Homer Simpson). And I was obviously some kinda tree- or seaweed-hugging 
hippy, since I was actually sweating to move my boat around instead of 
burning hydrocarbon like a normal person would...

Philip Torrens
N49°16' W123°06'


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: ralph diaz <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:55:57 -0800
Philip Torrens wrote:
> 
> >From: ralph diaz <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
> >4.  Security areas.  It is easy to forget that some places are protected
> >for security or other reasons.  Here, the vicinity of the Statue of
> >Liberty is one.  We are not supposed to get closer than x feet.  This is
> >especially true around the back end or westernmost side where there is a
> >landable beach of sorts.  I have had park rangers come running over with
> >hastily shouldered rifles when coming close in that area.
> 
> Jeez Ralph,
> I know my American cousins are trigger-happy, but what the hell is there on
> Ellis Island that requires the threat of deadly force to defend? Or is this
> one of those deals where if you tell us, you have to kill us? And whatever
> happened to that motto on Lady Liberty "give me your poor... your gasping
> kayakers yearning to take a pee?" (some paraphrasing may have occurred:-)

Actually on one of the times that guards scurried out and helicopters
started circling over us, I was in the company of several Canadians!!!  
Feathercraft's Doug Simpson and his wife, Sue, and at-the-time 4 year
old son, Evan (the latest Feathercraft ads picture him and his son
surfing in in a double Feathercraft).  We Americans do fear a possible
Canadian invasion.  I am certain I am not the only one who read those
two short novels back many years ago about hostilities between the US
and Canada: _Ultimatium_, in which the US, in the midst of a fuel
crisis, decides to annex Canada for its oil; and the sequel book,
_Exxoneration_, in which you Canadians cleverly win the war against the
invading American forces!!!  So you can see that we are a bit skittish
down here.

Another actually.  When Doug and family and I went around the Statue,
there was, a few moments before, the drive-by shooting of a busload of
Yeshiva students on the Brooklyn Bridge.  The incident instantly put
city and federal law enforcement people on alert for possible further
terrorist attacks.  We unknowingly paddled into the middle of all that. 
Sure had a lot of attention as we paddled near the Statue.  I counted 3
helicopters hovering over us and all sorts of guards ringing the
island.  I am sure their suspicions were heightened by innocent-looking
Canadians below.  :-)

ralph diaz

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <RBHoltKayak_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:40:42 EST
In a message dated 2/21/2000 1:05:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com writes:

<< We Americans do fear a possible Canadian invasion.  >>

    Are you sure you weren't  suspected of being involved in one of those 
dreaded Canadian Ballast Rock(tm) smuggling rings?  

                                        Robb
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirk Olsen <kolsen_at_imagelan.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:39:08 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, ralph diaz wrote:

> 4.  Security areas.  It is easy to forget that some places are protected
> for security or other reasons.  Here, the vicinity of the Statue of
> Liberty is one.  We are not supposed to get closer than x feet.

The USS Constitution in Boston is still an "active" military ship.

As such it's mooring is a secure area.  You can't get within about 100 
feet, while in the water, or the staff will request you back off.

I learned that one canoeing around boston harbor.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Tomckayak_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] bans on sea kayakers
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:57:59 EST
 New Dungeness Spit Wildlife refuge is located on the Strait of Juan De Fuca 
in Washington State. It is one of the longest sand spits in the world. My 
kayak club use to do an annual trip to the New Dungeness Spit in December 
each year. Most times it was a paddle to the Light house and back, a few 
times we went around the 5 mile long spit with a short portage if the 
conditions were right. When group size was small and far between we went 
unnoticed. The Coast Guard caretaker enjoyed the novelty.
Then outfitters started doing guided trips though out the summer and fall.  
This over use give rise to increased restrictions. The Wildlife refuge has 
limited Sea kayak access to a small beach near the Light house (and this may 
no longer be available) with a 5 dollar per person fee. Its hard to argue 
against these restraints in a wildlife refuge knowing the over use of 
outfitters. The Coast Guard is now gone, replaced by territorial, protection 
groups that blow the whistle on anyone kayaking out of bounds. I have not 
been back in years.

Tom Cromwell
Edmonds, Wa.
USA
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:09 PDT