OK, the results of my little survey are in. I don’t think I discovered anything really earth shattering, but as a great many of you expressed interest in what I was doing I thought it only fair that I share what I got. First let me say that the "reality check" was for myself and had nothing to do with this list. I appreciate the few minutes it took to contribute to my survey and would like to thank all of those who did. The problem I have been having has to do with putting a value on the Eskimo roll for touring/sea kayakers. While I agree that learning the roll usually makes learning bracing and other skills easier, and it can instill a greater sense of self confidence in the paddler (a good thing?), the fact remains that some very dramatic voyages have been undertaken by kayakers who could not roll, either because they lacked the skill, or because the boat they were using was not rollable. And what about canoes? Few canoeists can reliably roll their boats, yet some remarkable journeys have been made in canoes, not to mention they are regularly used for running whitewater. And what about sit-on-tops, folding boats and doubles? I just don’t understand why the roll is apparently of such great importance to beginning sea kayakers while it is virtually ignored by experienced canoeists and explorers? And so my survey -- 37 people responded. Of these, 49% had less then five years experience, 20% had between 5 and 10 years, and 31% had over 10. I think this is a pretty good spread for my purposes. As far as the years of experience at sea kayaking verses whitewater paddling, I was going on the premise that whitewater paddlers would put a greater emphasis on rolling then would the sea kayakers. This did not prove to be true according to the answers I received. 37% responded that they could not roll, 34% could roll close to 100% of the time, and the rest fell in between. In rating the value of the roll between 1 and 10 I came up with an average of 7. I’m not sure this is really representative of the group as half the answers were eight or above, but the few 1’s, 2’s, 3’s and 4’s really brought the average down. What was interesting is that 20% responded with something along the line of "it depends" rather then assign a number to it. I agree that the value of the roll depends on a number of individual factors. However, the "hard liners" I frequently butt heads with seem to view the sport, as well as the rest of the world, in terms of black and white. There isn’t any compromise – there’s right and wrong, this way and that, and they don’t want to be confused with the facts. So I was trying to force the issue by having people assign a single numerical value. I think one of the problems with this sport is that it can be so different depending on whose doing it and where. "Sea kayaking" seems to cover a pretty broad range of equipment and activities. Some people actually like the short fat "sport" boats, while the rest of us wouldn’t want to be caught dead in one (or perhaps that’s what we’re afraid of). Tooling around in a local lake or harbor, fishing, surfing, racing, camping, while all falling under the heading of "sea kayaking," all have different requirements for equipment and skills. Should we teach rolling as a beginner skill - should we always wear a pfd, a dry suit, a wet suit - what’s the best boat - can I paddle alone? It all depends. As far as where rolling falls as a skill to be learned, a whopping 69% placed it in the intermediate category. 14% said it was for beginners, and 17% called it advanced. I have always considered it to be an advanced skill myself, but as a result of this survey I just may have to rethink that. After all, we are living in a democratic society where the views of the majority make up the rules. If everyone decides that rolling is an intermediate kayaking skill, well, I guess I can live with that. I don’t necessarily agree with the majority, but I’ll try and go along with it anyway (see there. I actually do listen to you folks sometimes). What was interesting is that I tried to sort through the data by whitewater experience, as well as by years of kayaking experience, only to find that the results were pretty close to the same. This is encouraging in that it seems to indicate that the new paddlers are coming into this sport fairly well informed. Or, perhaps it’s just those on this list. So there you have it. Thanks again to all of you who participated. Scott So.Cal. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Mar 23 2000 - 05:00:04 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:21 PDT