PaddleWise by thread

From: Peter Osman <rebyl_kayak_at_hotmail.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Initial Stability, Rolling and Seaworthiness
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:31:50 GMT
G'Day,

Thanks to everyone for their replies to my question, here is a very 
comprehensive reply from Colin Calder who is off the air at present and 
suggested I forward it on to Paddlewise.

PeterO

From: "Colin & Fiona" <tiree_at_supanet.com>

Hi Peter

In reply to your paddlewise post:

>G'Day,
>      I'm in the middle of buying a second boat to further develop
>kayaking skills. The one I have at present is a Klepper (which is a
>lot of fun and would still be my first choice for a roughish sea).
>But I'm looking to develop rolling and better bracing skills and
>opting for a hardshell as the second boat.
>      Is it true that boats which have higher initial stability are
>not necessarily as stable in rough seas?

In rough water in a kayak it is paddler input which is important, ie what 
you do with your body and paddle, not just the hull shape. Flat bottomed or 
excessively beamy boats with so called 'high initial stability' are in my 
opinion a mare in rough water because the hull limits the amount of control 
you can exert with your body by edging and leaning. An analogy - Tricycles 
have more initial stability than Bicycles but would fall over a lot if used 
for mountainbiking. Probably less often mentioned but of concern 
nevertheless is the fact that the motion of beamier flat bottomed kayaks is 
considerably less comfortable in rough water - even ignoring the 
need-to-brace-to-avoid-capsize condition in a lumpy sea a beamy boat will 
throw you around much more and flat bottoms slam, both of which is tiring.

>Also can anyone tell me of circumstances when a roll, or reenter and
>roll is not the best method of self rescue in a hardshell?

The best rescue is not needing one .. thus I don't consider a roll any more 
a rescue than other bracing strokes. If you can't roll though, you can't 
re-enter roll. Catch 22. If you can roll, then falling over isn't likely to 
be as much of a problem! Opinions on the list clearly differ, and for any 
individual/conditions/locations its a judgement call but my opinion is that 
if you aren't capable of rolling in whatever condtions you probably 
shouldn't be paddling that water solo. .... If you aren't solo then I think 
if you do swim self rescue is probably going to be slower and less reliable 
than an assisted rescue. Thus my hierarchy would be:

1. Don't fall over (good bracing skills)
2. If you do, roll up
3. If you can't roll, take a bow rescue from a switched-on companion
(although I suspect that if you can't roll, you are unlikely to hang around 
too long for a bow rescue before swimming)
4. If you swim, make use of your friendly companions (it will stop them 
laughing for a few moments) to effect a speedy and safe rescue
5. No companions? hope you know how to roll. If for some exceptional reasons 
you swim, re-enter roll.

FWIW, I don't know of anyone who would consider going paddling solo on the 
sea if they didn't have a reliable roll, and I also don't know anyone who 
carries a paddlefloat with the serious intention of using it for an 
outrigger style self rescue (I do have an inflatable paddlefloat, bought out 
of curiosity really after reading the paddlewise list, but it would be my 
absolute last choice as a method of self rescue). The idea of relying on a 
paddlefloat as your only method of effecting rescues is something that I 
have only learned about through the wavelength/paddlewise lists, and the 
concept I find utterly amazing! - they are not a widely accepted accessory 
in these parts. It might be instructive to add that I don't have any 
experience of paddling in warm protected water (my sea kayaking is 
predominately around the coasts of Scotland: cold tidal waters with 
essentially no protected water at all on the east coast), and I can 
understand that warm procected conditions the whole 
newbie-gets-a-kayak-goes-out-falls-over-on-flat water scenario is a real one 
and self rescues like the paddlefloat outrigger method may have some value 
there, but that scenario doesn't really arise here. Contrary to what you 
might believe if you read some of the American importers of Valley or NDK 
web sites, sea kayaking is a tiny tiny minority sport in the UK, no rental 
outfits, no guided holiday trips, kayaks are only available from a very few 
specialist retailers ... and as a result those who take to the sea in kayaks 
typically tend to be paddlers who have first acquired boating skills on 
rivers and who as a rule also tend to paddle only with club/groups until 
they have more extensive experience.

>      Various sources have suggested that for hardshells a shorter,
>heavier (15ft & 26kg) boat with a V chine and relatively low initial
>stability might be more suitable in roughish seas than lighter longer boats 
>with greater initial stability (17ft & 22kg).

Not sure what you mean here ... have I got this right 'shorter and 
heavier'as opposed to 'longer and lighter'?

>I think one of the arguments goes that it is easier with the V chine
>to knee lift the boat horizontal when a wave is coming at a steep
>angle. Have I got the concepts right?

Hard chines on a V-bottom give a secure feel when the boat is edged or
leaned but will feel tippy initially, a round bottom is the easiest to
edge or lean but tippy at all angles of heal, a flat bottom the
hardest to edge and lean (stiff). Designs tend to use different
combinations and extremees of these features. Which is more stable?
Depends what you mean by stability but the important point is that as
conditions become rougher paddler input becomes more neccesary, not
just the boat, and what some perceive as unstable boats facilitate
more paddler control. Does that help? My advice is to paddle different
boats and feel the differences, and even if your off-balance strokes
and confidence isn't as good as it will be with experience, you will
still be able to feel if you have the concepts right, but also consider that 
in rough water the deck shape and the cockpit are also
important ... clearly if you have a boat that comes up to your
armpits, your movement is going to be limited and so therefore is your
bracing/rolling/stern rudders/boat control/etc etc, and while volume
(freeboard) = windage which is not good, it also increases how the
boat is knocked about left and right by the seas (which is also not
good).

Hope this helps. I'm temporarily on an email account on which I'm not
subscribed to Paddlewise (which is bouncing out of my regular account
to this one), and I suspect that the paddlewise server won't forward
mail to the list unless its from a subscribed account, so if you want
to forward this to the list please feel free to do so.

Cheers

Colin Calder
57°19'N 2°0'W

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <LedJube_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Initial Stability, Rolling and Seaworthiness
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:24:05 EST
In a message dated 3/8/00 10:00:43 AM, rebyl_kayak_at_hotmail.com writes:

<<Is it true that boats which have higher initial stability are not 
necessarily as stable in rough seas? Also can anyone tell me of 
circumstances when a roll, or reenter and roll is not the best method of 
self rescue in a hardshell?
     Various sources have suggested that for hardshells a shorter, heavier 
(15ft & 26kg) boat with a V chine and relatively low initial stability might 
be more suitable in roughish seas than lighter longer boats with greater 
initial stability (17ft & 22kg). I think one of the arguments goes that it 
is easier with the V chine to knee lift the boat horizontal when a wave is 
coming at a steep angle.          Have I got the concepts right?>>

    Others on this list can provide better scientific arguments but I'll toss 
out my own anecdotal evidence. Initial stability which makes the boat feel 
steady on flat water also causes it to track the surface contours during 
excited seas. Which is to say that a boat that it will be tossed around by 
the same stability as the waves steepen. Boats with low initial stability 
have a much reduced righting moment and hence are little affected by the wave 
action. The V shape hull is more about tracking than stability, a rounded 
hull can be equally seaworthy but may track less strongly.
Low initial stability boats are no harder to handle in rough water than they 
are in flat water. They are equally unstable in both conditions. High initial 
stability boats are at their best in flat water and become more difficult to 
handle as the conditions deteriorate.
    Shorter boats turn faster as a general rule and hence are easier to 
handle in rough water but there is a tradeoff in that the shorter length 
makes them more sensitive to wave action along the boats length and short can 
also mean slower to some extent.
    You are basically right about the knee lift versus steep waves as long as 
you substitute "lower initial stability" for "V chine".
    I've heard people argue the heavy versus light argument but for me it's 
more about sail area versus inertial. They argue that a heavier boat will be 
less affected by beam winds as the bow or stern rises out of the water. I 
believe that low windage is a better way to control this effect.
    I know of no condition where are roll is not the preferred self rescue 
but if for some reason it is not possible a reenter and roll would be my 
second choice followed by the assisted "T" rescue then lastly a paddlefloat 
reentry.

Best of luck!

Jed

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Bob Denton <BDenton_at_aquagulf.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Initial Stability, Rolling and Seaworthiness
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:27:53 -0500
I have two boats notable for their tippyness;the Nordkapp and Falcon 16.
Both perform admirably when conditions get rough. It's quite simple. Since
little force is required to tip the boat when the seas are flat, little
force is required to "tip" the boat vertical when the surface is inclined.

cu
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:10 PDT