Kenneth Cooperstein wrote: > <BTW, Cooperstein's post of the formula stimulated this post [re: paddles I use in a single versus a double]. I suspect it is intended for use in singles only. Dave Kruger> > Actually, a double would be appear to be accommodated by the boat width factor. Hi-ever, as with all regressions and factor analyses, you get into trouble when you try to extrapolate beyond the sample's envelope. I suspect > that the formula is not reliable for beams bigger than around 25". That may explain the large difference when I go from a single (220 cm) to a double (250 cm). The double is 36 inches wide! -- Dave Kruger Astoria, OR *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:10 PDT