Re: [Paddlewise] Opinions on double "foldables"?

From: ralph diaz <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:18:44 -0700
MSN/RiDem wrote:
> 
> Next year I am hoping to purchase a "foldable ", probably a double based on
> the following needs. Have been looking (on line) at the Klepper  Expedition
> II, or Folboat Greenland II. (and less likely Nautiraid Grand Raid 520). I
> have looked at M.Edelman's info page.
> Mostly I am seeking strong opinions, to weigh against my own still yet
> uninformed opinions. (I am a big fan of the dialectic!)

> Any suggestions, short of renting one of each and paddling one for a
> weekend? Price is not as much an issue, as  is ease of assembly,
> portability, durability, and maximum carrying capacity. We are moving away
> from a 17 foot canoe, and would have a LOT to learn, not only in packing
> gear in an enclosed space, but getting used to a double bladed paddle.

If money is no object, then I would think the Klepper Expedition double
would be the best choice of the two you are considering.  This is not to
knock the Folbot Greenland II.  It is an excellent boat and certainly
would do just fine in the situations you describe.  But the Klepper is a
better boat.  Folbot never claims to be building a boat as good as the
Klepper at a third of the price.  I have heard the company owner
acknowledge this, i.e. he has not discovered the secret of alchemy.  He
makes a boat that provides a lot of value for the money and backs it
with excellent customer service and lifetime warranty against breakage. 
Folbots are improving all the time; witness the switch to an aluminum
coaming which is far superior to the plastic they used earlier and has
stiffened the boat considerably.

But the Klepper hull is of a better grade than that of the Folbot.  What
is more the hull has keelstripes protecting high wear areas; these
strips are 2.5 inch wide at the chines and 10 inches wide across the
bottom.

The frame is extremely strong with a lot of redundancy built in.

The Klepper is somewhat more streamlined and a faster boat.

Stated carrying capacity is higher in the Klepper by about 200 pounds. 
If you go one grade higher and get the Quattro model, capacity goes up
to about 1,000 pounds.  The military load both the Expedition and
Quattro in excess of 1,000 and they do fine.

The available spraydeck for the Klepper is better than that on the
Folbot.  You have to look for the tuckunder version however to get the
best setup.

Klepper assembly is a bit faster than the Folbot but we are not talking
much difference.  I can do the Klepper double with a partner in 8
minutes (faster in race conditions), I couldn't do better than about 10
minutes with the Folbot.  Marginal difference granted.

Packing gear into a closed space.  If you set your mind to it, there are
ways of getting everything in via the cockpit.  There are a number of
hints in my book.  Basically, shove things in with a paddle half and
string tethers from the bags you shove furthest in, so you can retrieve
them latter.  Another trick is to take the Klepper long bag and fill it
about a third and push that end into the stern where it will go all the
way to the stern piece; then fill the next two thirds right from the
cockpit (the long bag is about the length of the rear compartment.

Please don't misinterprete me.  The Folbot is fine, it is just that the
Klepper is recognized as better.

A comparison I always use is that of tents.  A North Face is a top of
the line tent that is incredibly tough and heavy duty.  But Eureka also
makes fine tents that provide very good service.  The North Face just
happens to have thicker coatings, better cloth, tougher poles, better
sewing, better webbing straps, etc. Klepper is a North Face; Folbot a
Eureka.  The differences are not that of buying designer jeans for lots
of bucks when Levi's or Wrangler are just as good.

Again, I am working off of your comment about money not being an issue. 
With me it is.  I couldn't justify to myself spending Klepper prices and
if I were in the market, I would gladly buy a Folbot Greenland II and,
from my considerable experience and knowledge, know that I would be very
happy with it.

ralph diaz 
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Mon Apr 10 2000 - 23:19:58 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:22 PDT