JCMARTIN43_at_aol.com wrote: [re: need of commercial magazines to have an "exclusive" shot at news:] > So I feel the pain for you, Doug, at least to some degree. It's too bad that the information which we all seem to want to see disseminated to the widest possible degree winds up wavering with editorial policy, out of reach of the people who have the most to gain by reading it. Perhaps the main lesson here is that glossy pages give us stuff which is heavily massaged for the reading audience, and (on the beneficial side) subject to checking and rechecking, to include more than one viewpoint. Doug's narrative would be enriched by the inclusion of the thoughts of his companions. Doug was willing to share; the others, less so. We are the poorer for not having their thoughts. Their sense of privacy demands their silence, and I respect that. No easy solutions to human needs. -- Dave Kruger Astoria, OR *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Apr 13 2000 - 08:11:56 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:22 PDT