Jackie commented on my comparison of sharks and bears and took objection. I thought I'd clarify. I had not intended to suggest that sharks are a _lot_ more risk than bears. Rather, I pointed out that sharks were a greater risk than bears (based on the number of deaths, which I glibbly refered to as "statistically"). Nontheless, the actual risk is small to the point of being negligible. In both cases, the total number of deaths is small. As I said, divers do not clamour for spear guns when diving. However, hikers and campers, notable American, can't keep their hands off their guns when wandering into the woods. Just follow rec.backcountry for more than a couple of weeks and you'll see lots of gun discussion. Why this is is beyond the ken of almost everyone outside of the US. I was comparing the two groups to try to emphasize the difference in attitude. The risk doesn't result in the same response. These critters represent a negligible threat to us when we travel in the backcountry or dive/swim/kayak in the oceans. You can put yourself into a riskier than normal situation, but you've no one to blame but yourself. Don't kill everything in sight because you don't do your homework. Forget the guns - spend the money on a good camera. That kind of shooting is worthwhile. Mike *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat Apr 22 2000 - 16:27:02 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:23 PDT