> > Careful about interpreting these standard definitions for waterproofness. > > They are used in watches as well and have a totally different meaning when > > interpreted from a technicians point of view. > > > When they quote that standard and a depth of one meter they are really > > talking about the pressure equivalent to a depth of one meter of > > *unmoving water*. > So...this makes me wonder about my new Pentax WR105 camera. It's stated > depth is one meter, and I've rolled with it tucked inside my PFD. > Should I be worried? Has anyone ever had a WR105/WR90 fail after a > roll? Inside your PFD it's less than 1 meter down, and the water inside the PFD isn't flowing very fast, is it? My WR90 has been through Class III's with no problems. Steve *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net Subscriptions: paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed May 10 2000 - 14:16:42 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:24 PDT